fix: remove-oa-v3#12
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR updates TrustVC documentation to narrow OpenAttestation version support from v2/v3 to v2, removes v3 code examples and field paths, and emphasizes W3C Verifiable Credentials attachment structures across three guides: getting-started, attachments, and QR code implementation. ChangesOpenAttestation v2 Documentation Narrowing
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/how-tos/attachments.md (3)
53-53: 💤 Low valueDocumentation references only v2 but code handles v3.
Similar to the previous comment, the text mentions "common variations found in OA v2 documents", but the code at lines 65-66 checks for both v2 and v3 documents. Consider mentioning both versions for consistency with the code behavior.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/how-tos/attachments.md` at line 53, Update the sentence in attachments.md so it documents that the renderer handles both OA v2 and v3 variations (not just v2); specifically mention that it looks for the recommended fields (data, filename, mimeType) and also checks common variations found in OA v2 and v3 documents to match the code that checks for both v2 and v3.
72-86: 💤 Low valueInline comments reference only v2 but code handles both versions.
The inline comments at lines 72-73 and 75 mention field name variations as "(recommended, and OA v2)" and "(common in OA v2)", but the code at line 65 processes both v2 and v3 documents. If these field name variations also apply to v3, consider updating the comments to reflect that (e.g., "and OA v2/v3") for accuracy. If v3 uses different field names, the current comments are correct.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/how-tos/attachments.md` around lines 72 - 86, The inline comments next to the label and type resolution (the lines that describe fileName/filename and type/mimeType) inaccurately reference only "OA v2" while the code path that builds label/type (using the variables label, type and calling attachmentToComponent(attachment, document)) handles both v2 and v3 documents; update those comments to accurately reflect that the fallback checks apply to both OA v2 and v3 (e.g., change "(recommended, and OA v2)" and "(common in OA v2)" to "(recommended; applies to OA v2/v3)") or, if v3 differs, explicitly call out the v3 field differences so the comment next to label, type, and attachmentToComponent is correct.
41-42: ⚡ Quick winConsider clarifying v3 verification support for reader clarity.
The text states the renderer "can parse attachments from older OpenAttestation (OA) v2 formats", but the code snippet at lines 65-66 explicitly checks for both v2 and v3 documents (
isV2Document(document) || isV3Document(document)). Since the PR description confirms v3 documents remain verifiable and this section describes verification/rendering (not creation), consider briefly acknowledging v3 support to avoid reader confusion.For example: "can parse attachments from older OpenAttestation (OA v2 and v3 for backward compatibility) formats"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/how-tos/attachments.md` around lines 41 - 42, The text in attachments.md implies only OA v2 parsing support but the renderer and code check both isV2Document and isV3Document; update the sentence to explicitly state that the renderer can parse attachments from both OpenAttestation v2 and v3 formats (for backward compatibility) so readers know v3 documents are also verifiable; modify the sentence referencing "older OpenAttestation (OA) v2 formats" to mention "OA v2 and v3" and/or add a short parenthetical noting that the renderer uses isV2Document and isV3Document checks for verification/rendering.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/how-tos/attachments.md`:
- Line 53: Update the sentence in attachments.md so it documents that the
renderer handles both OA v2 and v3 variations (not just v2); specifically
mention that it looks for the recommended fields (data, filename, mimeType) and
also checks common variations found in OA v2 and v3 documents to match the code
that checks for both v2 and v3.
- Around line 72-86: The inline comments next to the label and type resolution
(the lines that describe fileName/filename and type/mimeType) inaccurately
reference only "OA v2" while the code path that builds label/type (using the
variables label, type and calling attachmentToComponent(attachment, document))
handles both v2 and v3 documents; update those comments to accurately reflect
that the fallback checks apply to both OA v2 and v3 (e.g., change "(recommended,
and OA v2)" and "(common in OA v2)" to "(recommended; applies to OA v2/v3)") or,
if v3 differs, explicitly call out the v3 field differences so the comment next
to label, type, and attachmentToComponent is correct.
- Around line 41-42: The text in attachments.md implies only OA v2 parsing
support but the renderer and code check both isV2Document and isV3Document;
update the sentence to explicitly state that the renderer can parse attachments
from both OpenAttestation v2 and v3 formats (for backward compatibility) so
readers know v3 documents are also verifiable; modify the sentence referencing
"older OpenAttestation (OA) v2 formats" to mention "OA v2 and v3" and/or add a
short parenthetical noting that the renderer uses isV2Document and isV3Document
checks for verification/rendering.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: ea467cb5-74bc-4ad1-8130-8ebe99e80881
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
docs/getting-started.mddocs/how-tos/attachments.mddocs/how-tos/implementing-qr-codes.mddocs/tutorial/decentralized-renderer.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- docs/how-tos/implementing-qr-codes.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2 participants
fix: remove OA v3
Removes OpenAttestation v3 references from documentation while retaining OA v3 verification support.
Changes
getting-started.md— UpdatedsignOAdescription to reflect v2 onlyattachments.md— Removed OA v3 legacy format section and v3 field referencesimplementing-qr-codes.md— Removed OA v3 QR code example andcredentialSubject.links.self.hrefreferencedecentralized-renderer.md— Removed V3 from supported formats; commented outBillOfLadingSchemaV3type,v3import, andTemplateASampleV3sample usageSummary by CodeRabbit
filenameandmimeTypefields