Skip to content

Typo fix in README.md #17

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 8, 2020
Merged

Typo fix in README.md #17

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Let's have a look at the resulting ELBO:
julia> AdvancedVI.elbo(advi, q, logπ, 1000)
-287.7866366886285
```
Unfortunately, the *final* value of the ELBO is not always a very good diagnostic, though it's an important metric to keep an eye on during training since a *decrease* in the ELBO means we're going in the right direction. Luckily, this is such a simple problem that we can indeed obtain a closed form solution! Because we're lazy (at least I am), we'll let [ConjugatePriors.jl](https://github.com/JuliaStats/ConjugatePriors.jl) do this for us:
Unfortunately, the *final* value of the ELBO is not always a very good diagnostic, though the ELBO is an important metric to keep an eye on during training since an *increase* in the ELBO means we're going in the right direction. Luckily, this is such a simple problem that we can indeed obtain a closed form solution! Because we're lazy (at least I am), we'll let [ConjugatePriors.jl](https://github.com/JuliaStats/ConjugatePriors.jl) do this for us:
```julia
julia> # True posterior
using ConjugatePriors
Expand Down