Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CompatHelper: bump compat for Bijectors to 0.11 for package test, (keep existing compat) #456

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2023

This pull request changes the compat entry for the Bijectors package from 0.9.5, 0.10 to 0.9.5, 0.10, 0.11 for package test.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.

Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

@devmotion devmotion force-pushed the compathelper/new_version/2023-02-02-00-09-09-626-03099976659 branch from 991bb7f to 213f4e7 Compare February 2, 2023 00:09
@bors bors bot closed this in 0d82a65 Feb 3, 2023
@yebai yebai deleted the compathelper/new_version/2023-02-02-00-09-09-626-03099976659 branch February 3, 2023 14:52
yebai added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2023
…eep existing compat) (#469)

* Fixed a typo in tutorial (#451)

* CompatHelper: bump compat for Turing to 0.24 for package turing, (keep existing compat) (#450)

This pull request changes the compat entry for the `Turing` package from `0.21` to `0.21, 0.24` for package turing.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.



Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

Co-authored-by: Hong Ge <3279477+yebai@users.noreply.github.com>

* Some minor utility improvements (#452)

This PR does the following:
- Moves the `varname_leaves` from `TestUtils` to main module.
  - It can be very useful in Turing.jl for constructing `Chains` and the like, so I think it's a good idea to make it part of the main module rather than keeping it "hidden" there.
- Makes the default `varinfo` in the constructor of `LogDensityFunction` be `model.context` rather than a new `DynamicPPL.DefaultContext`.
  - The `context` pass to `evaluate!!` will override the leaf-context in `model.context`, and so the current default constructor always uses `DefaultContext` as the leaf-context, even if the `Model` has been `contextualize`d with some other leaf-context, e.g. `PriorContext`. This PR fixes this issue.

* Always run CI  (#453)

I find the current `bors` workflow a bit tedious. Most of the time, I summon `bors` to see the CI results (see e.g. #438). Given that most `CI` tests are quick (< 10mins), we can always run them by default. 

The most time-consuming `IntegrationTests` is still run by `bors` to avoid excessive CI runs.

* Compat with new Bijectors.jl (#454)

This PR makes DPPL compatible with the changes to come in TuringLang/Bijectors.jl#214.

Tests are passing locally.

Closes #455 Closes #456

* Another Bijectors.jl compat bound bump (#457)

* CompatHelper: bump compat for MCMCChains to 6 for package test, (keep existing compat) (#467)

This pull request changes the compat entry for the `MCMCChains` package from `4.0.4, 5` to `4.0.4, 5, 6` for package test.
This keeps the compat entries for earlier versions.



Note: I have not tested your package with this new compat entry.
It is your responsibility to make sure that your package tests pass before you merge this pull request.

Co-authored-by: Hong Ge <3279477+yebai@users.noreply.github.com>

* CompatHelper: bump compat for AbstractPPL to 0.6 for package test, (keep existing compat)

---------

Co-authored-by: Hong Ge <3279477+yebai@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <compathelper_noreply@julialang.org>
Co-authored-by: Tor Erlend Fjelde <tor.erlend95@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants