Threadsafe evaluation #667
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
penelopeysm
force-pushed
the
threadsafe
branch
2 times, most recently
from
b439fcf to
5a35874
Compare
penelopeysm
force-pushed
the
threadsafe
branch
from
5a35874 to
0b80363
Compare
Contributor
|
Preview the changes: https://turinglang.org/docs/pr-previews/667 |
mhauru
approved these changes
Nov 27, 2025
Member
mhauru
left a comment
mhauru
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Added one optional fix just to prove that I actually read it. Thanks @penelopeysm!
Co-authored-by: Markus Hauru <mhauru@turing.ac.uk>
Member
Author
|
Good catch! 😄 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #656.
Preview here: https://turinglang.org/docs/pr-previews/667/usage/threadsafe-evaluation/
I would have liked to add a TSVI vs no-TSVI benchmark to demonstrate the performance difference, but the problem is that that will require us to release DPPL 0.39 + a compatible Turing version. So at this point in time, it is not possible to write that on this repo.