Skip to content

feat(apollo-vertex): dashboard template — registry entry and docs page#739

Draft
petervachon wants to merge 1 commit into
pr/9-dashboard-refactorfrom
pr/10-dashboard-docs
Draft

feat(apollo-vertex): dashboard template — registry entry and docs page#739
petervachon wants to merge 1 commit into
pr/9-dashboard-refactorfrom
pr/10-dashboard-docs

Conversation

@petervachon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What this does

Makes the dashboard template officially part of the Apollo Vertex registry and
adds its documentation page.

  • Registry entry — adds the dashboard template to registry.json so it
    is discoverable and installable via the shadcn CLI alongside other Apollo
    templates
  • Docs page — a dedicated documentation page at /templates/dashboard
    that covers: what the template is for, how to install it, how to swap in
    real data, and how to customise the visual configuration
  • _meta.ts update — registers the new docs page in the site navigation
    so it appears in the sidebar under Templates

This is the final slice in the dashboard stack. Once the preceding PRs merge
in order, this one lands the template in the registry and makes it available
to consumers.

Depends on

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…nd layout updates

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 21, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (PT)
apollo-design 🟢 Ready Preview, Logs May 21, 2026, 08:47:38 AM
apollo-docs 🟢 Ready Preview, Logs May 21, 2026, 08:47:38 AM
apollo-landing 🟢 Ready Preview, Logs May 21, 2026, 08:47:38 AM
apollo-ui-react 🟢 Ready Preview, Logs May 21, 2026, 08:47:38 AM
apollo-vertex 🟢 Ready Preview, Logs May 21, 2026, 08:47:38 AM

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Dependency License Review

  • 1901 package(s) scanned
  • ✅ No license issues found
  • ⚠️ 2 package(s) excluded (see details below)
License distribution
License Packages
MIT 1671
ISC 89
Apache-2.0 55
BSD-3-Clause 27
BSD-2-Clause 23
BlueOak-1.0.0 8
MPL-2.0 4
MIT-0 3
CC0-1.0 3
MIT OR Apache-2.0 2
(MIT OR Apache-2.0) 2
Unlicense 2
LGPL-3.0-or-later 1
Python-2.0 1
CC-BY-4.0 1
(MPL-2.0 OR Apache-2.0) 1
Unknown 1
Artistic-2.0 1
(WTFPL OR MIT) 1
(BSD-2-Clause OR MIT OR Apache-2.0) 1
CC-BY-3.0 1
0BSD 1
(MIT OR CC0-1.0) 1
MIT AND ISC 1
Excluded packages
Package Version License Reason
@img/sharp-libvips-linux-x64 1.2.4 LGPL-3.0-or-later LGPL pre-built binary, not linked
khroma 2.1.0 Unknown MIT per GitHub repo, missing license field in package.json

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant