Skip to content

Conversation

mangstadt
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would personally put these two on separate lines...

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also full would rather be named qualified ;)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or maybe fullyQualified

@Vogel612
Copy link
Collaborator

about now I am half through.... I will do a thorough check on the rest tomorrow ;)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this whole if-else construct wants to be hidden inside a method

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, thanks.

@Vogel612
Copy link
Collaborator

What's overall left to say is that JavaDocAccessor could use the extraction of methods to abstract and document how it internally works ;)

@Vogel612 Vogel612 mentioned this pull request Jan 25, 2015
Vogel612 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2015
Merged in the latest changes to the "javadoc" command from OakBot.
@Vogel612 Vogel612 merged commit 5691327 into Unihedro:master Jan 25, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants