Instrument Scientists who are not on any instrument on the Call still need access to the proposals

[TCMeldrum]

Instrument scis from places like deuteration and others need to be able to see the proposals without being assigned to the instrument. This could require the creation of a new role like instrument manger or proposals viewer or the like. It could also link into the want for a "facility" user officer to limit isis and clf uos from seeing/changing other's config/proposals.

From support, End of Oct 2024

Outcome from meeting on 28/02/25: Tom, Josh, Simon, Deepak, Pooja

1217 is closed as a duplicate for this issue. However, worth reading the comment by George there.

@Cat-Lucifer : Adding your ask for a "Technical Staff" role requirement here as this is the issue closest to this work.

“Technical staff”
Has read only access to all proposals and proposal info for all calls within the facility (but not the review capabilities)

[joshhdawes]

Ideally 3rd of March 25, but can wait until end of March 25.

[joshhdawes]

When we do this, we need to consider a solution that allows instrument scientists to be attached to facilities (ISIS, CLF, etc), which they currently aren't. This PR - UserOfficeProject/user-office-core#877 - briefly touched on the fact that instrument scientists aren't attached to facilities, meaning we can't include facility checks when checking instrument scientist permissions. Current workaround is to use calls to implicitly indicate the facility - we should have "facility" as an explicit concept.