Skip to content

Conversation

@kripken
Copy link
Member

@kripken kripken commented Aug 28, 2018

The dylink section must be first, per the spec (to make it easy to parse by loaders). We used to emit all user sections at the end, which was incorrect, so reading-writing a dynamic library broke it.

@kripken kripken requested a review from yurydelendik August 28, 2018 19:06
@kripken
Copy link
Member Author

kripken commented Aug 31, 2018

Looks like no concerns here, merging.

@kripken kripken merged commit 02ae5a6 into master Aug 31, 2018
@kripken kripken deleted the dylink-rw branch August 31, 2018 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants