Conversation
…S stuff wasi doesn't need like dynCalls, and emits a wasi _start if relevant.
sbc100
reviewed
Sep 12, 2019
Member
Author
|
Ok, I renamed the flag from wasi to |
Member
Author
|
Renamed again, to |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The flag indicates that we want to run the wasm by itself, without JS support. In that case we don't emit JS dynCalls etc., and we also emit a wasi
_startif there is a main, i.e., we try to use the current conventions in the wasm-only space.