Skip to content

Conversation

@tlively
Copy link
Member

@tlively tlively commented Feb 2, 2026

It was previously numbered 6.3, incorrectly conflicting with
6.3-text.instructions.spectec.

In the upstream spec repo, the contents of wasm-latest must always be
the same as the highest numbered wasm-X.Y spec directory. Add a CI
script to enforce this.
It was previously numbered 6.3, incorrectly conflicting with
6.3-text.instructions.spectec.
Base automatically changed from wasm-latest-ci-scripts to main February 3, 2026 00:11
@tlively tlively merged commit 4d130b3 into main Feb 3, 2026
3 checks passed
@tlively tlively deleted the fix-6.4-text-name branch February 3, 2026 00:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants