Begin tracking JSPI support for Firefox #384
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yurydelendik
reviewed
Jun 5, 2024
yurydelendik
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2024
Contributor
yurydelendik
left a comment
yurydelendik
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good with additional flag note
Co-authored-by: Yury Delendik <ydelendik@mozilla.com>
Member
Author
|
@yurydelendik Thank you! - I've merged your suggested rewording. @dschuff I think with that, this PR should be good to be merged? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This begins tracking JSPI support on Firefox, which has been merged as part of Firefox 127 (nightly). Implementation work is still ongoing, but a minimal version appears to be working already. I don't think it's stable yet, but I think it should be available for testing behind a flag?
@yurydelendik as the implementer of this in Firefox, can I ask you to review the diff here? Ty!
References