`barcode.PROVIDED_BARCODES` vs. Supported Formats in docs

[SeaDude]

Hello,

Thank you for all the hard work you put into this library. I'm curious between the barcodes shown in barcode.PROVIDED_BARCODES and the list of Supported Formats in the docs.

• Are there more Supported Formats then those lined out in the docs?
• Or are the codes listed in PROVIDED_BARCODES derivatives of other codes?

Example:

• I don't see codabar, ean13-guard, gs1, etc. in the Supported Formats section of the docs.

['codabar', 'code128', 'code39', 'ean', 'ean13', 'ean13-guard', 'ean14', 'ean8', 'ean8-guard', 'gs1', 'gs1_128', 'gtin', 'isbn', 'isbn10', 'isbn13', 'issn', 'itf', 'jan', 'nw-7', 'pzn', 'upc', 'upca']

[WhyNotHugo]

There should be no different between barcode.PROVIDED_BARCODES vs. Supported Formats. Some are missing from the docs as an oversight.

I guess that when generating the docs, we should read barcode.PROVIDED_BARCODES, and include all the barcodes listed there programatically.

[WhyNotHugo]

I'll actually leave this open as a reminder that this needs to be fixed.