CP-849 Add Apache 2.0 license, dart_dev #19
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
+1 |
Contributor
|
+1 |
|
+1, do we have guidelines on which license applies to what? Apache 2.0 for all public repos? |
Contributor
Author
|
@dustinlessard-wf yes, Apache 2.0 for OSS. |
Contributor
Author
|
@trentgrover-wf @maxwellpeterson-wf @dustinlessard-wf rebased on latest master. |
|
+1 |
Member
|
+1 |
jayudey-wf
changed the title
Contributor
|
QA +1 adding license Merging into master |
jayudey-wf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2015
CP-849 Add Apache 2.0 license, dart_dev
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
#17 Before making this repo public, we need to add the Apache 2.0 license to the repo and to all source files.
Changes
Added
LICENSEandNOTICEfiles. Used the newcopy-licensetask to apply this license to all source files.Areas of Regression
Testing
Code Review
@trentgrover-wf
@maxwellpeterson-wf
@dustinlessard-wf
fyi: @jayudey-wf