-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 844
Fix ctrie tests #100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix ctrie tests #100
Conversation
trie/ctrie/ctrie_test.go
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it make more sense for this to be
for range expected {
<-iter
}There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably. Does that for syntax work with go1.3?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
for _ := range expected {
}then?
|
Looks like an unrelated test failed. |
|
+1 |
1 similar comment
|
+1 |
|
Looks like CI is passing now. |
I'm fairly certain this fixes the sporadic issues happening with the ctrie tests (#99). This also should make the tests quite a bit faster.
@alexandercampbell-wf @dustinhiatt-wf @stevenosborne-wf