Skip to content

Conversation

@tylertreat-wf
Copy link
Contributor

I'm fairly certain this fixes the sporadic issues happening with the ctrie tests (#99). This also should make the tests quite a bit faster.

@alexandercampbell-wf @dustinhiatt-wf @stevenosborne-wf

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it make more sense for this to be

for range expected {
        <-iter
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably. Does that for syntax work with go1.3?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for _ := range expected {
}

then?

@tylertreat-wf
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like an unrelated test failed.

@dustinhiatt-wf
Copy link
Contributor

+1

1 similar comment
@alexandercampbell-wk
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@tylertreat-wf
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like CI is passing now.

dustinhiatt-wf added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2015
@dustinhiatt-wf dustinhiatt-wf merged commit 023c25a into master Jul 7, 2015
@alexandercampbell-wk alexandercampbell-wk deleted the travis_gomaxprocs branch July 13, 2016 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants