Skip to content

Conversation

@MartijnR
Copy link
Contributor

@MartijnR MartijnR commented Jan 14, 2021

I noticed there are 10 failing ODK Validate tests (step 2 of release steps), but that was the case in the previous version as well, and I'm guessing may have been the case for much longer. Are we just ignoring this?

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 14, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #512 (ff09255) into master (435c933) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #512   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.81%   83.81%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        3694     3694           
  Branches      860      860           
=======================================
  Hits         3096     3096           
  Misses        453      453           
  Partials      145      145           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pyxform/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 435c933...ff09255. Read the comment docs.

@lognaturel
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, I've been not very good and just let those slide. I believe all of them just need slight reworks of the tests (e.g. using a valid function name, not having cycles, indexing into all repeats).

@yanokwa yanokwa merged commit 1c4a2ed into master Jan 14, 2021
@yanokwa yanokwa deleted the v1.3.4 branch January 14, 2021 19:52
@MartijnR
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you!

KeynesYouDigIt pushed a commit to KeynesYouDigIt/pyxform that referenced this pull request May 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants