Amendment Idea: Permissioned AMM (domain-gated native AMM for KYC/FI liquidity) #621
Grow420Crypto
started this conversation in
XLS Ideas (pre standard proposal)
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
Vault Desk by AiVibes builds ops software for regulated desks that want gated RLUSD / XRPL flows (human dual-control + agent API). We are not asking for a private chain — we need the same credential / Permissioned Domain model that already works for order books to cover native AMM pools.
Why Permissioned DEX alone is not enough for large FIs
XLS-81 Permissioned DEXes correctly gate offers. Official docs also state permissioned trading cannot use AMMs, and AMM access cannot be restricted by a Permissioned Domain today.
Large FIs that require KYC/AML on every counterparty often want dual-asset liquidity provision (AMM-style LP), not only CLOB. Today the honest answer we have to give them is:
Depositing into an open AMM from KYC’d wallets (e.g. app-level KYC) does not make the pool KYC-only — strangers can still deposit/swap unless the AMM object itself enforces a domain.
Ask
Please advance a Permissioned AMM amendment (domain-gated
AMMCreate/ deposit / withdraw / optional swaps), reusing Credentials (XLS-70) + Permissioned Domains (XLS-80), complementary to XLS-81.Useful properties for FI adoption:
DomainID(who may LP / govern; optionally who may swap)Context
We previously saw a draft “Permissioned AMM” direction in the ecosystem; the older discussion link we had (
#566) now 404s. Happy to refine requirements with authors/validators from an ops-desk / FI tooling perspective.Contact:
support@everhostx.com— Vault Desk by AiVibes (anonymous-safe brand).All reactions