You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the pixel mode in live streaming does not use any compression. This allows us to deliver the highest possible quality and lossless output, but it naturally comes at the cost of higher bandwidth consumption.
We could implement a compression method to significantly reduce bandwidth, but this would require careful optimization to maintain the 30 FPS target without overloading the CPU/GPU.
Before diving into the optimization process, I'd love to hear the community's thoughts on what should be the priority for pixel mode:
Which approach makes the most sense for your use cases?
Raw Quality: Keep it lossless and highest quality, bandwidth is not a primary concern for this mode.
0%
Bandwidth Efficiency: Compression is a must. Lower bandwidth is more important than perfect pixel clarity.
0%
Offer compression as an optional flag (e.g., --profile), letting the user choose between performance and quality.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello everyone,
Currently, the pixel mode in live streaming does not use any compression. This allows us to deliver the highest possible quality and lossless output, but it naturally comes at the cost of higher bandwidth consumption.
We could implement a compression method to significantly reduce bandwidth, but this would require careful optimization to maintain the 30 FPS target without overloading the CPU/GPU.
Before diving into the optimization process, I'd love to hear the community's thoughts on what should be the priority for pixel mode:
0 votes ·
All reactions