Skip to content

fix: [N-05] Style inconsistencies #324

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2023
Merged

fix: [N-05] Style inconsistencies #324

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion contracts/ZkSync_SpokePool.sol
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -150,14 +150,14 @@ contract ZkSync_SpokePool is SpokePool {
function _bridgeTokensToHubPool(RelayerRefundLeaf memory relayerRefundLeaf) internal override {
// SpokePool is expected to receive ETH from the L1 HubPool and currently, withdrawing ETH directly
// over the ERC20 Bridge is blocked at the contract level. Therefore, we need to unwrap it before withdrawing.
emit ZkSyncTokensBridged(relayerRefundLeaf.l2TokenAddress, hubPool, relayerRefundLeaf.amountToReturn);
if (relayerRefundLeaf.l2TokenAddress == address(wrappedNativeToken)) {
WETH9Interface(relayerRefundLeaf.l2TokenAddress).withdraw(relayerRefundLeaf.amountToReturn); // Unwrap into ETH.
// To withdraw tokens, we actually call 'withdraw' on the L2 eth token itself.
IL2ETH(l2Eth).withdraw{ value: relayerRefundLeaf.amountToReturn }(hubPool);
} else {
zkErc20Bridge.withdraw(hubPool, relayerRefundLeaf.l2TokenAddress, relayerRefundLeaf.amountToReturn);
}
emit ZkSyncTokensBridged(relayerRefundLeaf.l2TokenAddress, hubPool, relayerRefundLeaf.amountToReturn);
}

function _setZkBridge(ZkBridgeLike _zkErc20Bridge) internal {
Expand Down