Skip to content

Document how to use WCAG SC numbers in EARL#1846

Merged
WilcoFiers merged 3 commits intodevelopfrom
implementation-format-tweaks
May 30, 2022
Merged

Document how to use WCAG SC numbers in EARL#1846
WilcoFiers merged 3 commits intodevelopfrom
implementation-format-tweaks

Conversation

@WilcoFiers
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I wanted to provide a way that implementors could map to WCAG criteria without needing to look up WCAG IDs. This describes how to do it. The code for processing them has already been pushed to act-tools.

Need for Call for Review: None, editorial


How to Review And Approve

  • Go to the “Files changed” tab
  • Here you will have the option to leave comments on different lines.
  • Once the review is completed, find the “Review changes” button in the top right, select “Approve” (if you are really confident in the rule) or "Request changes" and click “Submit review”.
  • Make sure to also review the proposed Call for Review period. In case of disagreement, the longer period wins.

Comment thread pages/implementations/earl-reports.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: Carlos Duarte <carlosapaduarte@gmail.com>
Jym77
Jym77 previously requested changes May 19, 2022
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Jym77 Jym77 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small clarification, feel free to ignore.

Comment thread pages/implementations/earl-reports.md
Comment thread pages/implementations/earl-reports.md Outdated
Co-authored-by: Jean-Yves Moyen <jym@siteimprove.com>
@WilcoFiers WilcoFiers requested a review from Jym77 May 19, 2022 14:16
@WilcoFiers WilcoFiers merged commit 98cf9fe into develop May 30, 2022
@WilcoFiers WilcoFiers deleted the implementation-format-tweaks branch May 30, 2022 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants