Replies: 1 comment
|
The gem already supports RubyLLM implementations, do you have additional feature ideas other than a RubyLLM provider that you'd like to open a PR to review? |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Would it make sense for this project, and maybe others too, to collaborate with Ruby LLM?
For example, by breaking out provider-logic and tests into e.g.
ruby-llm-providersgem?That way, gems built on top of that, such as the existing RubyLLM gem, or ActiveAgents, can focus on it's unique things, and not reproducing provider API intricacies.
Thoughts?
cc @crmne
All reactions