chore: Cleanup Core GBTS#5102
Conversation
|
This looks good to me 👍 , thanks for doing this! |
benjaminhuth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, thank you for going over this.
The most striking thing for me is the large amount of magic numbers, that should be constexpr static values or configurable I think.
But this probably is better done in a follow-up PR
|
in regards to @benjaminhuth comments about hardcoded values i agree and I'll planning on doing a more thorough search through at some point soon, i think this will also help in making GBTS more detector independent, I'm not entirely convinced that all the ITK "bias" from its original implementation has been taken out |
|



Similar to #5093 but for the Core GBTS code
--- END COMMIT MESSAGE ---