Added minimal beaglebone blue support #665
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
makermelissa
approved these changes
Apr 4, 2023
Collaborator
makermelissa
left a comment
makermelissa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for adding. Hopefully somebody who has one of these boards will add the GPIO pins later.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I needed to use I2C on the BeagleBone Blue, so I added support for that in the library. This pr only includes pins that I have tested personally, but someone with more knowledge about the blue might be able to fill in the blanks. According to this, it might be pretty similar to the black, but I don't know anything for sure. Would the maintainers want a partially supported board like this included in the official library or kept as a fork?