Disucssion of new I2C target terminology; fix one misuse

[bergdahl]

CircuitPython version

Any

Code/REPL

None

Behavior

While doing the latest batch of localization in Weblate I discovered the text All I2C targets are in use and that there was already translations for All I2C peripherals are in use. I was advised to open an issue by @jepler to get all messages in CP in line for the new terminology.

Description

No response

Additional information

No response

[dhalbert]

The particular message in question is wrong (see #6738) and should not be "All I2C targets are in use", because the original message "All I2C peripherals are in use" referred to the hardware blocks on the microcontroller chip, not a standalone I2C "peripheral". Such a device was previously called an "I2C slave", then we changed it to "I2C peripheral" (which confuses it with the on-chip hardware). NXP in a recent revision of the I2C standard changed "slave" to "target" (probably to avoid this confusion). See https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/user-guide/UM10204.pdf.

Following up on the discord conversation for "I2C target", mål (goal) sounds ok, since it could be a physical goal (as opposed to a conceptual goal). I see that archery target is bågskyttemål or mål för bågskytte, which is in the same vein. Same for fotbollsmål.

[bergdahl]

OK, so peripheral = part of the MCU and target = external sensor. I have changed my translation accordingly on Weblate.