Skip to content

Add board definition for the uGame handheld console#397

Merged
tannewt merged 1 commit into
adafruit:2.xfrom
pypewpew:ugame-port
Nov 1, 2017
Merged

Add board definition for the uGame handheld console#397
tannewt merged 1 commit into
adafruit:2.xfrom
pypewpew:ugame-port

Conversation

@deshipu
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@deshipu deshipu commented Nov 1, 2017

This is a board definition for the uGame project:
https://hackaday.io/project/27629-game

uGame is a small handheld game console programmable with
CircuitPython. The hardware part of the project is pretty
much stable by now.

This is a board definition for the uGame project:
https://hackaday.io/project/27629-game

uGame is a small handheld game console programmable with
CircuitPython. The hardware part of the project is pretty
much stable by now.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tannewt tannewt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks super cool!

What support do you need to get this running 3.x?

@tannewt tannewt merged commit c066e4d into adafruit:2.x Nov 1, 2017
@deshipu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

deshipu commented Nov 1, 2017

I'm not sure yet, but I don't think it needs anything special. It's just one struct and one function, and the only thing they need is the spi write function, so I think it should just work out of the box, but I haven't tested it yet.

@deshipu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

deshipu commented Nov 1, 2017

Ah, sorry, wrong pull request. The board itself is basically as trinket m0 haxpress with custom pins.

@tannewt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

tannewt commented Nov 1, 2017

Answering here is ok because I don't expect you to submit a board for a version you can't test.

We don't have SPI support quite yet but will soon. Once we do, please migrate your dev to it. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants