Skip to content

ports/windows: Remove appveyor.yml#730

Merged
tannewt merged 1 commit into
adafruit:masterfrom
jepler:remove-appveyor-circuitpython
Apr 2, 2018
Merged

ports/windows: Remove appveyor.yml#730
tannewt merged 1 commit into
adafruit:masterfrom
jepler:remove-appveyor-circuitpython

Conversation

@jepler
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jepler jepler commented Mar 31, 2018

.. this allows developers who want to work with both micropython and circuitpython to enable appveyor on their fork, but not get errors when pushing circuitpython changes.

In the appveyor configuration for your fork, simply enable the checkbox "Skip branches without appveyor.yml".

@jepler jepler force-pushed the remove-appveyor-circuitpython branch from 8bd5605 to 50c00f4 Compare March 31, 2018 17:04
@jepler jepler changed the title ports/widows: Remove appveyor.yml ports/windows: Remove appveyor.yml Mar 31, 2018
@tannewt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

tannewt commented Apr 2, 2018

Please update this. (I think merging the parallel PR messed it up.) Thanks!

.. this allows developers who want to work with both micropython and
circuitpython to enable appveyor on their fork, but not get errors
when pushing circuitpython changes.

In the appveyor configuration for your fork, simply enable the
checkbox "Skip branches without appveyor.yml".
@jepler jepler force-pushed the remove-appveyor-circuitpython branch from 50c00f4 to c592b0e Compare April 2, 2018 12:59
@jepler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

jepler commented Apr 2, 2018

@tannewt rebased, thanks for the heads up.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@tannewt tannewt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@tannewt tannewt merged commit b018436 into adafruit:master Apr 2, 2018
@jepler jepler deleted the remove-appveyor-circuitpython branch November 3, 2021 21:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants