Skip to content

docs: AI disclosure, transparency footer, red-team FAQ entries#2329

Merged
bokelley merged 1 commit intomainfrom
bokelley/redteam-3.0
Apr 18, 2026
Merged

docs: AI disclosure, transparency footer, red-team FAQ entries#2329
bokelley merged 1 commit intomainfrom
bokelley/redteam-3.0

Conversation

@bokelley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Test plan

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Publishes docs/ai-disclosure.mdx (authorship, data handling, human-review
SLA, institutional conflicts, regulatory posture). Adds Transparency
footer column with AI Disclosure and Governance Charter links plus a
site-wide AI-authored/AI-assisted message. Extends the FAQ with
governance, Scope3 relationship (interim board composition, recusal
areas), auction-vs-agentic scope (buy_terms as SPO surface),
adagents↔ads.txt crosswalk, forward-looking regulated-vertical autonomy
limits (#2310), and buyer-agent security posture as 3.0 GA commitments
(#2306/#2307). Updates FAQ maturity answer for 3.0 GA target and post-3.0
release cadence.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Schema Link Check Results

Commit: 8bb005f - docs: AI disclosure, transparency footer, red-team FAQ entries

⚠️ Warnings (schema not yet released)

These schemas exist in source but haven't been released yet. The links will be broken until the next version is published:

  • https://adcontextprotocol.org/schemas/v3/enums/specialism.json
    • Schema exists in latest (source) but not yet released in v3
    • Action: This link will work after next 3.x release is published

To fix: Either:

  1. Wait for the next release and merge this PR after the release is published
  2. Use latest instead of a version alias if you need the link to work immediately (note: latest is the development version and may change)
  3. Coordinate with maintainers to cut a new release before merging

@bokelley bokelley merged commit 60e31f8 into main Apr 18, 2026
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant