Skip to content

Conversation

@barshat7
Copy link
Contributor

@barshat7 barshat7 commented Apr 8, 2024

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have signed the Adobe Open Source CLA.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes and the overall coverage did not decrease.
  • All unit tests pass on CircleCi.
  • I ran all tests locally and they pass.

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 92 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.75%. Comparing base (c94da71) to head (62043ac).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                dev    #1171   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     80.75%   80.75%           
  Complexity      773      773           
=========================================
  Files            91       91           
  Lines          2110     2110           
  Branches        285      285           
=========================================
  Hits           1704     1704           
  Misses          252      252           
  Partials        154      154           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

});
});

it.only("should not show calendar widget if marked readonly", () => {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove only

Copy link
Collaborator

@rismehta rismehta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor comment, else changes looks good now. Can you also add test case to update read only via JS API in the cypress test case, so that the other piece of code also has the required coverage ?

@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the datepicker-issue-readonly branch from ef9889d to 62043ac Compare April 10, 2024 05:41
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (mobile)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 89 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Lighthouse scores (desktop)

Performance Accessibility Best-Practices SEO
Scores 100 100 100 73

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

2 similar comments
@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@adobe-bot
Copy link

Accessibility Violations Found

Id Impact
label-title-only serious
landmark-one-main moderate
region moderate
target-size serious

@rismehta rismehta merged commit 43069ee into dev Apr 10, 2024
@rismehta rismehta deleted the datepicker-issue-readonly branch April 10, 2024 10:05
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2024
)

* datepicker readonly does not work when edit or display format set

* Update datepicker.runtime.spec.js

---------

Co-authored-by: Rishi Mehta <69448117+rismehta@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
)

* datepicker readonly does not work when edit or display format set

* Update datepicker.runtime.spec.js

---------

Co-authored-by: Rishi Mehta <69448117+rismehta@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants