Skip to content

Conversation

@asgerf
Copy link
Collaborator

@asgerf asgerf commented Dec 8, 2025

No description provided.

data-douser
data-douser previously approved these changes Dec 8, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@data-douser data-douser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes alone did not solve the problem when using v2.23.7, as tested in #266 . Perhaps we need to wait for an updated v2.23.7 release, or a new v2.23.8 release, and/or to just apply the overlay[local?] annotation more broadly.

@data-douser data-douser dismissed their stale review December 8, 2025 17:24

Dismissing my own review to discourage merging until without more testing.

Copy link
Contributor

@jeongsoolee09 jeongsoolee09 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a breaking change between 2.23.6 and 2.23.7 where all subclasses of ModelInput::TypeModel should be annotated with overlay[local?]. It is recorded in this PR, although the PR itself is closed.

Since these client-side changes are needed anyways, I'll merge it.

@jeongsoolee09 jeongsoolee09 merged commit 033f586 into main Dec 9, 2025
5 checks passed
@jeongsoolee09 jeongsoolee09 deleted the asgerf/isTypeUsed-overlay-local branch December 9, 2025 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants