Replies: 1 comment
-
|
From the current SDK docs/types, I would treat The proto and Python model both make it optional, and the Go SDK docs describe it as Unix milliseconds for when the event was created. So integrations leaving it unset is valid. If an adapter does populate it, the least surprising value is the time the adapter emits/translates the AG-UI event; if you need the original framework event time, keep that in I also would not use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I have a question regarding the intended semantics of
BaseEvent.timestamp.While integrating Google ADK with AG-UI, I started looking into how
BaseEvent.timestampis intended to be used.From what I found:
BaseEventdefines an optionaltimestampfield.Questions
What is
BaseEvent.timestampintended to represent?Is leaving
timestampunset the intended behavior for integrations?I'd appreciate any clarification on the intended design.
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions