refactor: decompose 8 large files into focused components#127
refactor: decompose 8 large files into focused components#127jbdevprimary merged 8 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @jbdevprimary, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly improves the codebase's modularity and maintainability by decomposing eight large files into smaller, more focused, and reusable components. This refactoring effort aims to reduce file complexity, enhance readability, and streamline future development and testing. The changes primarily involve extracting UI elements and logic into new, dedicated components, ensuring that each component adheres to the single responsibility principle and keeps file sizes manageable. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![amazon-q-developer[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1220912?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary
This refactoring successfully decomposes 8 large files (300-400+ lines) into 15 focused components, bringing all files under 250 lines. The changes maintain backward compatibility through barrel exports and preserve all existing functionality.
Key Improvements
✅ Clean component extraction - Each new component has a single, clear responsibility
✅ Type safety maintained - All TypeScript types properly exported and imported
✅ No logic changes - Pure refactoring without behavioral modifications
✅ Error handling preserved - All existing error handling remains intact
✅ Backward compatibility - Barrel re-exports ensure no breaking changes
Files Reviewed
- ✅
openai-client.ts→openai-helpers.ts+openai-stream-parser.ts - ✅
FileTree.tsx→TreeNode.tsxextracted - ✅
create-project.tsx→RepoSelector,ProjectFormcomponents - ✅
github-auth.tsx→DeviceCodeDisplay,PollingStatuscomponents - ✅
settings.tsx→SettingsItem,SettingsSectioncomponents - ✅
credentials.tsx→CredentialItem,ApiKeyInputcomponents - ✅
agent/[id].tsx→AgentMetrics,AgentHistory,AgentActionscomponents - ✅
project/[id].tsx→ProjectHeader,ProjectFileExplorer,ProjectActionscomponents
The refactoring improves code maintainability and testability without introducing any defects. Ready to merge.
You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.
…ponents Extract ProjectHeader, ProjectFileExplorer, ProjectCommits, ProjectTasks, and ProjectAgents from app/project/[id].tsx into src/components/project/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…or and ProjectForm Extract RepoSelector and ProjectForm (Header + Actions) from app/(onboarding)/create-project.tsx into src/components/onboarding/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
🚀 Expo preview is ready!
|
…ntials screen Move CredentialItem and ApiKeyInput components into src/components/settings/CredentialSection.tsx for reuse. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…entHistory, AgentActions Extract reusable agent components from app/agent/[id].tsx into src/components/agents/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…tings screen Move SettingsItem and SettingsSection into src/components/settings/ for reuse across settings-related screens. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…m github-auth screen Move auth UI components into src/components/onboarding/ for reuse. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…eam-parser Move stream chunk processing and result assembly logic into a dedicated openai-stream-parser module. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Move TreeNode rendering logic into src/components/code/TreeNode.tsx. Extract formatMessagesForOpenAI, parseOpenAIContent, and mapOpenAIStopReason into openai-helpers.ts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
jbdevprimary
force-pushed
the
ralph/ws-decomposition-2
branch
from
9b8bc04 to
4a75997
Compare
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is an excellent and extensive refactoring effort that successfully decomposes several large files into smaller, more focused, and reusable components. The changes significantly improve the codebase's modularity, readability, and maintainability, aligning perfectly with the goals outlined in the description. The new component structure is logical and the extractions have been handled cleanly. I've included a couple of suggestions for minor improvements to further enhance maintainability, but overall, this is a very strong contribution.
| interface RepoSelectorProps { | ||
| repos: RepoListItem[]; | ||
| filteredRepos: RepoListItem[]; | ||
| selectedRepo: RepoListItem | null; | ||
| searchQuery: string; | ||
| isLoadingRepos: boolean; | ||
| errorMessage: string | null; | ||
| onSelectRepo: (repo: RepoListItem) => void; | ||
| onSearchChange: (query: string) => void; | ||
| // New repo creation | ||
| mode: 'select' | 'create'; | ||
| onModeChange: (mode: 'select' | 'create') => void; | ||
| newRepoName: string; | ||
| newRepoDescription: string; | ||
| newRepoPrivate: boolean; | ||
| isCreatingRepo: boolean; | ||
| onNewRepoNameChange: (name: string) => void; | ||
| onNewRepoDescriptionChange: (desc: string) => void; | ||
| onNewRepoPrivateChange: (isPrivate: boolean) => void; | ||
| onCreateNewRepo: () => void; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The RepoSelectorProps interface has a large number of props, which can make the component harder to use and maintain. Consider grouping related props into objects. For example, all props related to new repository creation could be grouped into a newRepoForm object. This would make the component's signature cleaner and more organized.
Example:
interface NewRepoFormProps {
mode: 'select' | 'create';
onModeChange: (mode: 'select' | 'create') => void;
name: string;
onNameChange: (name: string) => void;
description: string;
onDescriptionChange: (desc: string) => void;
isPrivate: boolean;
onIsPrivateChange: (isPrivate: boolean) => void;
isCreating: boolean;
onCreate: () => void;
}
interface RepoSelectorProps {
// ... other props
newRepoForm: NewRepoFormProps;
}This would require refactoring in both this component and its parent, create-project.tsx, but it would improve long-term maintainability.
| </View> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| commits.map((c, idx) => ( | ||
| <View key={`${c.sha}-${idx}`}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using an index idx as part of a React key is an anti-pattern. If the commits array changes (e.g., a new commit is added), indices will shift, causing unnecessary re-renders and potential state issues. Since c.sha is a 7-character slice of the commit hash, it should be unique enough for this list. Using it alone as the key is more stable and performant.
| <View key={`${c.sha}-${idx}`}> | |
| <View key={c.sha}> |
|
1 participant
Summary
US-115: Decompose 3 screens over 400 lines
US-116: Decompose 5 files at 300-350 lines
Results
All files now under 250 lines. 15 new focused components with barrel re-exports for backward compatibility.
Verification
🤖 Generated with Claude Code