fix: brand consistency, new components, and accessibility (issues #80, #82, #83, #86)#142
Conversation
- OrchestrationState: use getTask() helper instead of direct taskQueue.find() to correctly detect cancelled deps in completedTasks (CodeRabbit #134) - DiffViewer: combine additions/deletions into single-pass useMemo (Gemini #134) - DiffViewer: export parseDiff for testability - diff-viewer.perf.test: rename to kebab-case, add memoization spy test verifying parseDiff is NOT called on re-render (Amazon Q + Gemini #134) - FileTree: pass selectedPath directly instead of converting undefined to empty string which changes "no selection" semantics (Amazon Q #139) - sonar-project.properties: remove stale app/_layout.tsx comment (CodeRabbit #139) - create-project: add auth error detection with recovery guidance (Amazon Q #132) https://claude.ai/code/session_01PQd4hGQQpmGTgpHc7kGjAE
…ibility - Add missing organic border-radius variants to Tailwind config (hero, cta, modal, toast, code) and replace inline/arbitrary values in NotFound, welcome, complete, and AgentDetail pages (#80) - Add shadow-organic-card to card surfaces across detail pages, onboarding screens, and settings for proper visual hierarchy (#82) - Enhance Skeleton with SkeletonText and SkeletonCard compound components, build Pagination component with organic styling (#83) - Fix accessibility: aria-hidden on decorative dots, aria-live on typing indicator and progress, aria-label on search input and role icon, progressbar role on task progress (#86) https://claude.ai/code/session_01PQd4hGQQpmGTgpHc7kGjAE
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @jbdevprimary, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refines the application's user interface and experience by standardizing visual elements and introducing new UI components. It ensures brand consistency through unified border-radius styles and improved visual hierarchy with consistent card shadows. Furthermore, it boosts the application's usability and inclusivity by implementing crucial accessibility features across various interactive elements and dynamic content. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![amazon-q-developer[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1220912?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unable to Complete Review
I encountered a technical issue while attempting to review PR #142. While the PR diff was successfully retrieved (21 files changed), I was unable to access the file contents from the repository's head branch. This prevented me from performing a thorough code review with proper context.
PR Summary:
- Addresses issues #80, #82, #83, and #86
- Adds organic border-radius variants to Tailwind config
- Implements new Pagination component and enhanced Skeleton components
- Applies shadow styling for visual hierarchy
- Adds accessibility improvements (aria-hidden, aria-live, aria-label, progressbar roles)
Technical Issue:
All attempts to retrieve file contents resulted in "File not found" errors, despite the diff being successfully retrieved. This may indicate:
- Repository access permissions issue
- Branch synchronization problem
- API connectivity issue
Recommendation:
Please retry the review process or check repository access permissions. The changes appear to be focused on UI consistency and accessibility improvements, which are valuable additions that should be properly reviewed once file access is restored.
You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This is a great pull request that delivers on multiple fronts. The introduction of new border-radius variants to the Tailwind config and the consistent application of these and the new shadow classes significantly improve brand consistency and maintainability by removing hardcoded styles. The new Pagination, SkeletonText, and SkeletonCard components are well-implemented and valuable additions. I'm particularly impressed with the numerous accessibility improvements across the application, such as adding ARIA attributes for screen readers. The code is clean and the changes are well-aligned with the stated goals. I've only found one minor opportunity for improvement.
| className="bg-surface-elevated p-6 flex flex-col items-center" | ||
| style={{ borderRadius: '16px 12px 20px 8px' }} | ||
| style={{ borderRadius: '1rem 0.75rem 1.25rem 0.5rem' }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While this change correctly updates the border-radius to use rem units, it misses the opportunity to fully embrace the new Tailwind configuration. To improve maintainability and align with the goal of replacing inline styles, it would be better to use the rounded-organic-card class directly, which is now available in tailwind.config.ts.
| className="bg-surface-elevated p-6 flex flex-col items-center" | |
| style={{ borderRadius: '16px 12px 20px 8px' }} | |
| style={{ borderRadius: '1rem 0.75rem 1.25rem 0.5rem' }} | |
| className="bg-surface-elevated p-6 flex flex-col items-center rounded-organic-card" |
2 participants
Summary
organic-hero,organic-cta,organic-modal,organic-toast,organic-code) and replaced inline/arbitrary border-radius values in NotFound, welcome, complete, and AgentDetail pagesshadow-organic-cardto card surfaces across detail pages, onboarding screens, and settings to establish proper visual hierarchySkeletonwithSkeletonTextandSkeletonCardcompound components; built newPaginationcomponent with organic styling and full accessibilityaria-hiddenon decorative status dots,aria-liveon typing indicator and progress updates,aria-labelon search input and agent role icon,progressbarrole on task progress barFiles Changed (15)
tailwind.config.ts— New organic border-radius classessrc/components/feedback/Loading.tsx— SkeletonText, SkeletonCardsrc/components/feedback/Pagination.tsx— New componentsrc/components/feedback/index.ts— Updated exportssrc/pages/NotFound.tsx— Use organic Tailwind classessrc/pages/detail/AgentDetail.tsx— Shadows, a11y, organic hero classsrc/pages/detail/ProjectDetail.tsx— Shadows on cardssrc/pages/onboarding/*.tsx— Shadows, organic hero classsrc/pages/tabs/*.tsx— A11y fixes, shadowsTest plan
Closes #80, closes #82, partially addresses #83 and #86.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01PQd4hGQQpmGTgpHc7kGjAE