docs: clarify local Jido test helpers#296
Merged
Merged
Conversation
f39423f to
1cad277
Compare
mikehostetler
commented
Jun 2, 2026
mikehostetler
left a comment
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed the updated diff. This is now docs-only, uses plain ExUnit.Case setup instead of MyApp.JidoCase, and leaves CHANGELOG.md untouched. Local checks passed (mix test, mix q). GitHub CI summary is green; the only red lane is the non-blocking experimental OTP 29 / Elixir 1.20-rc compile job, failing in meck dependency compilation and marked as warning-only.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
JidoTest.Case/JidoTest.Eventuallyare repo-local test helpers, not published package APIsMyApp.JidoCasepattern for isolated runtime testsVerification
mix testmix qRelated to #295. Leaving the issue open for any follow-up discussion.