Skip to content

docs: clarify local Jido test helpers#296

Merged
mikehostetler merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/clarify-jido-test-helpers
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

docs: clarify local Jido test helpers#296
mikehostetler merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/clarify-jido-test-helpers

Conversation

@mikehostetler

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • clarify that JidoTest.Case / JidoTest.Eventually are repo-local test helpers, not published package APIs
  • show an app-owned MyApp.JidoCase pattern for isolated runtime tests
  • update related guide/module docs and usage rules to describe the isolation pattern directly

Verification

  • mix test
  • mix q

Related to #295. Leaving the issue open for any follow-up discussion.

@mikehostetler mikehostetler force-pushed the docs/clarify-jido-test-helpers branch from f39423f to 1cad277 Compare June 2, 2026 21:46

@mikehostetler mikehostetler left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed the updated diff. This is now docs-only, uses plain ExUnit.Case setup instead of MyApp.JidoCase, and leaves CHANGELOG.md untouched. Local checks passed (mix test, mix q). GitHub CI summary is green; the only red lane is the non-blocking experimental OTP 29 / Elixir 1.20-rc compile job, failing in meck dependency compilation and marked as warning-only.

@mikehostetler mikehostetler merged commit 69b1c90 into main Jun 2, 2026
16 of 17 checks passed
@mikehostetler mikehostetler deleted the docs/clarify-jido-test-helpers branch June 2, 2026 21:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant