IDE ssi solver with abi#145
Merged
Merged
Conversation
JTrenerry
approved these changes
May 8, 2026
Collaborator
|
string matching = bad, so maybe eventually something more sound could be used? (i.e. call_preserved flag or something but that would be just string matching to begin with lol) |
Owner
|
I've unmerged this, going down this road ends up in the mess basil had. We need a systematic approach to abi not hacks in each individual transform/analysis |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Assume R19 to R29 and R31 are preserved across external function calls to get better simplification