Conversation
|
Hi! After reading about OpenAPI 4 (which thinks more in "requests" than "operation"), I have made some Openapi 3 specific jargon less visible from the API in 1.0 to get a good chance of being backwards compatible when "Moonwalk" is coming. However, at this point this seems pretty premature. So I am open for the idea if you need it, but if possible I would like to use a more abstract API instead. What field do you want to access specifically? Did you see |
|
We have a custom property |
That sounds like a pretty common use case.
…I think i prefer 1., because it is less confusing if you already know OpenAPI, which you probably do if you are using this gem :) |
|
I'd go with the |
I'd like to be able to programmatically access the OAS definition details. Exposing the
operationwould make it possible by doing:request(env).operation[key]What do you think about that? :)