Add health check test for gui module fix TC-APPLICATION-CL skip:test_…

[muhabalwan-aginx]

…long_running

[github-actions]

Claude encountered an error —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[github-actions]

Claude encountered an error —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[github-actions]

Claude encountered an error —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[github-actions]

Claude finished @muhabalwan-aginx's task —— View job

---

PR Review Complete ✅

Reviewed PR #217: Add health check test for gui module

Summary

This PR adds a new health check test for the system GUI module and links test IDs to existing tests. The changes are minimal and well-structured. I've identified one blocking issue that must be fixed before merge, plus several improvement suggestions.

---

🔴 BLOCKING ISSUE

1. Missing Test Marker in settings_test.py

Location: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py::test_custom_env_file_location

Issue: This test lacks a category marker (unit, integration, or e2e). According to repository standards, EVERY test MUST have at least one of these markers, otherwise it will NOT run in CI.

Why this matters: The CI pipeline explicitly filters tests by markers. Tests without unit, integration, or e2e markers are excluded from execution.

Reproduce:

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# Shows: collected 580 items / 579 deselected / 1 selected
# That 1 selected test is test_custom_env_file_location

Fix: Add the appropriate marker to the test. Based on the test's characteristics (mocks environment, no external services), it should be marked as @pytest.mark.unit:

@pytest.mark.unit
def test_custom_env_file_location(reset_cached_settings, record_property) -> None:
    """Test custom env file location."""
    # ... rest of test

Verify:

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# Should show: collected 580 items / 580 deselected / 0 selected

Note: This issue exists in the main branch and is NOT introduced by this PR. However, it should be addressed before merging to maintain test coverage standards.

---

✅ POSITIVE FINDINGS

Changes in This PR

1. tests/aignostics/system/gui_test.py (+38 lines)

   • ✅ New test test_gui_system_health_shown_and_updated properly marked with @pytest.mark.e2e
   • ✅ Appropriate markers: @pytest.mark.flaky, @pytest.mark.sequential
   • ✅ Correct timeout: @pytest.mark.timeout(timeout=60 * 3) (3 minutes)
   • ✅ Good test design: Verifies health status display and updates with 35-second wait
   • ✅ Properly linked to test IDs: TEST-SYSTEM-GUI-HEALTH, SWR-SYSTEM-GUI-HEALTH-1

2. tests/aignostics/notebook/gui_test.py (1 line changed)

   • ✅ Added missing test ID link: TC-NOTEBOOK-GUI-01 to existing test
   • ✅ Test already properly marked with @pytest.mark.integration

3. tests/aignostics/application/cli_test.py (1 line added)

   • ✅ Minor formatting improvement (blank line after record_property)
   • ✅ Test already properly marked with @pytest.mark.e2e and @pytest.mark.very_long_running

---

💡 SUGGESTIONS (Non-Blocking)

1. Commit Message Convention

Current commits:

• ❌ "link missing notebook test" - Missing conventional commit format
• ❌ "Add health check test for gui module fix TC-APPLICATION-CLI" - Not following format

Expected format: type(scope): description

Suggested:

test(system): add health check GUI test for footer status display
test(notebook): link TC-NOTEBOOK-GUI-01 to marimo extension test
test(application): add blank line for readability

Reference: See root CLAUDE.md "Development Workflow" section for commit conventions.

2. Import Organization in New Test

Location: tests/aignostics/system/gui_test.py:69-72

Current:

# Wait for health update interval (HEALTH_UPDATE_INTERVAL = 30 seconds)
# Wait slightly longer to ensure the update has occurred
import asyncio

await asyncio.sleep(35)

Suggestion: Move import asyncio to top of file with other imports for consistency with PEP 8 and repository standards.

Why: Repository standards specify import order: stdlib → 3rd-party → local. Mid-function imports should only be used when absolutely necessary (circular dependencies, optional features).

3. Test Robustness

Location: tests/aignostics/system/gui_test.py:69-71

The test uses a hardcoded 35-second sleep to wait for health updates. Consider if this could be made more resilient:

Current approach:

await asyncio.sleep(35)  # Wait for HEALTH_UPDATE_INTERVAL (30s) + buffer

Alternative consideration: If the health update mechanism exposes an event or observable, the test could wait for the actual update rather than using a fixed timeout. However, given this is a GUI test and the current approach is straightforward, the hardcoded sleep is acceptable.

---

📊 Test Suite Validation

All changed tests have proper markers: ✅

• test_gui_system_health_shown_and_updated: @pytest.mark.e2e ✅
• test_gui_marimo_extension: @pytest.mark.integration ✅
• test_cli_run_execute: @pytest.mark.e2e, @pytest.mark.very_long_running ✅

Test categorization is appropriate:

• System GUI health test correctly marked as e2e (requires GUI rendering)
• Notebook GUI test correctly marked as integration (mocked external services)
• Sequential marker on health test is appropriate (GUI state dependencies)

Coverage: All new code is tested. New test adds valuable coverage for health status display.

---

🎯 ACTION ITEMS

Required Before Merge (Blocking):

1. Add @pytest.mark.unit marker to test_custom_env_file_location in tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py
   • This is not introduced by this PR but should be fixed to maintain standards
   • File: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py:120
   • Add decorator before function definition

Recommended (Non-Blocking):

1. Update commit messages to follow conventional commit format (for future PRs)
2. Move import asyncio to top of tests/aignostics/system/gui_test.py

---

✅ FINAL VERDICT

Status: Approve with required fix for unmarked test

The PR changes themselves are excellent and properly structured. However, there is one pre-existing test in the main codebase that lacks the required marker. This should be fixed before merge to maintain CI test coverage integrity.

Quality Assessment:

• ✅ Test markers: Present and appropriate (in PR changes)
• ✅ Code quality: Clean and well-documented
• ✅ Test design: Robust with appropriate timeouts and retries
• ✅ Test IDs: Properly linked for traceability
• ⚠️ Pre-existing issue: One unmarked test in main branch

Recommendation: Fix the blocking issue, then merge. The PR itself demonstrates high quality standards.

---

[github-actions]

Claude finished @muhabalwan-aginx's task —— View job

---

Re-review Complete: PR #217 Status Update

I've reviewed the new commit pushed to this PR. Here's what I found:

Tasks

• Read changed files to understand new commits
• Check if blocking issue (missing test marker in settings_test.py) was fixed
• Run unmarked test check to verify all tests have markers
• Review any new changes for issues
• Provide final verdict

---

⚠️ BLOCKING ISSUE STILL UNRESOLVED

The blocking issue I identified in my previous review has NOT been addressed in this commit.

Issue Details

Problem: Test without required category marker

Location: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py:198

Test name: test_custom_env_file_location

Why this is critical: According to repository standards documented in CLAUDE.md:

IMPORTANT: Every test MUST have at least one of: unit, integration, or e2e marker, otherwise it will NOT run in CI. The CI pipeline explicitly runs tests with these markers only.

Verification:

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# Output: collected 580 items / 579 deselected / 1 selected
# The 1 selected test is: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py::test_custom_env_file_location

Required fix: Add @pytest.mark.unit decorator to the test at line 198:

@pytest.mark.unit
def test_custom_env_file_location(reset_cached_settings, record_property) -> None:
    """Test custom env file location.
    ...

Why unit: This test:

• Mocks the environment with mock.patch.dict
• Uses temporary files (no external services)
• Tests settings loading in isolation
• Should pass offline

These characteristics match the definition of a unit test from .github/CLAUDE.md.

---

✅ PR Changes Review

The actual changes in this PR are excellent and properly structured:

1. New Test: test_gui_system_health_shown_and_updated (+38 lines)

File: tests/aignostics/system/gui_test.py:47-79

Status: ✅ All good

Positive findings:

• ✅ Properly marked with @pytest.mark.e2e (requires GUI rendering)
• ✅ Correct timeout: @pytest.mark.timeout(timeout=60 * 3) (3 minutes)
• ✅ Appropriate markers: @pytest.mark.flaky, @pytest.mark.sequential
• ✅ Good test design: Verifies health status display and periodic updates
• ✅ Test IDs properly linked: TEST-SYSTEM-GUI-HEALTH, SWR-SYSTEM-GUI-HEALTH-1
• ✅ Clear documentation explaining 35-second wait for health update interval

Minor suggestion (non-blocking):

• Line 69: import asyncio should be moved to top of file with other imports per PEP 8 and repository standards

2. Test ID Linking: test_gui_marimo_extension (1 line)

File: tests/aignostics/notebook/gui_test.py:12

Status: ✅ All good

Change: Added TC-NOTEBOOK-GUI-01 to existing test's tested-item-id record property

3. Formatting: test_cli_run_execute (+1 blank line)

File: tests/aignostics/application/cli_test.py:662

Status: ✅ All good

Change: Added blank line after record_property for improved readability

---

🎯 Code Quality Checks

Linting: ✅ PASSED

make lint
# All checks passed!
# - ruff check: ✅
# - ruff format: ✅ (152 files already formatted)
# - pyright: ✅ (0 errors, 0 warnings)
# - mypy: ✅ (Success: no issues found in 80 source files)

Test Markers: ❌ FAILED (1 unmarked test in main branch)

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# 1/580 tests collected (579 deselected)
# Missing marker: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py::test_custom_env_file_location

Commit Message: ⚠️ Could be improved

Current:  "chore(test,ketryx): link missing tests with test cases and add missing test for gui health footer"
Better:   "test(system): add health check GUI test and link test IDs"

(Not blocking - commit message follows conventional format, just could be more concise)

---

📋 Summary

What's new in this commit:

• ✅ New GUI health check test with proper markers and documentation
• ✅ Test ID linking for traceability
• ✅ Minor formatting improvement

What still needs fixing:

• ❌ BLOCKING: Add @pytest.mark.unit to test_custom_env_file_location in tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py:198

Note: The unmarked test exists in the main branch and was NOT introduced by this PR. However, it should be fixed to maintain test coverage standards before merging this PR.

---

🔧 How to Fix

Run this command to add the missing marker:

# Edit the file
# Add @pytest.mark.unit before the function definition at line 198

Verify the fix:

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# Should output: collected 580 items / 580 deselected / 0 selected

---

🎯 Recommendation

Action: Request changes - fix blocking issue, then merge

The PR changes are high quality and demonstrate proper testing standards. Once the pre-existing unmarked test is addressed, this PR will be ready to merge.

Quality assessment:

• ✅ PR changes: Excellent (proper markers, clear documentation, good test design)
• ✅ Code quality: All linting passes
• ❌ Test coverage: One unmarked test blocks CI execution
• ✅ Traceability: Test IDs properly linked

---

[github-actions]

Claude finished @muhabalwan-aginx's task —— View job

---

Re-review Complete: PR #217 Status Update

I've reviewed the latest commit pushed to this PR. Here's what I found:

Tasks

• Read changed files to understand new commits
• Check if blocking issue (missing test marker in settings_test.py) was fixed
• Run unmarked test check to verify all tests have markers
• Review any new changes for issues
• Provide final verdict

---

⚠️ BLOCKING ISSUE STILL UNRESOLVED

The blocking issue I identified in my previous review has NOT been addressed in this commit.

Issue Details

Problem: Test without required category marker

Location: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py:198

Test name: test_custom_env_file_location

Why this is critical: According to repository standards documented in CLAUDE.md:

IMPORTANT: Every test MUST have at least one of: unit, integration, or e2e marker, otherwise it will NOT run in CI. The CI pipeline explicitly runs tests with these markers only.

Verification:

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# Output: collected 580 items / 579 deselected / 1 selected
# The 1 selected test is: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py::test_custom_env_file_location

Required fix: Add @pytest.mark.unit decorator to the test at line 198:

@pytest.mark.unit
def test_custom_env_file_location(reset_cached_settings, record_property) -> None:
    """Test custom env file location.
    ...

Why unit: This test:

• Mocks the environment with mock.patch.dict
• Uses temporary files (no external services)
• Tests settings loading in isolation
• Should pass offline

These characteristics match the definition of a unit test from .github/CLAUDE.md.

---

✅ PR Changes Review

The actual changes in this PR are excellent and properly structured:

1. New Test: test_gui_system_health_shown_and_updated (+34 lines)

File: tests/aignostics/system/gui_test.py:43-75

Status: ✅ All good

Positive findings:

• ✅ Properly marked with @pytest.mark.integration (mocked external services, GUI testing)
• ✅ Correct timeout: @pytest.mark.timeout(timeout=60) (1 minute)
• ✅ Good test design: Verifies health status display across multiple pages
• ✅ Test IDs properly linked: TEST-SYSTEM-GUI-HEALTH, SWR-SYSTEM-GUI-HEALTH-1
• ✅ Clear documentation explaining test purpose and requirements
• ✅ Tests "always visible" requirement by checking multiple pages

Test logic:

# Tests health visibility on 3 different pages
pages_to_test = ["/", "/system", "/dataset/idc"]
for page in pages_to_test:
    await user.open(page)
    await user.should_see("Launchpad is", retries=5 * 100)
    # Verify either healthy or unhealthy status is shown

2. Test ID Linking: test_gui_marimo_extension (1 line)

File: tests/aignostics/notebook/gui_test.py:12

Status: ✅ All good

Change: Added TC-NOTEBOOK-GUI-01 to existing test's tested-item-id record property

3. Formatting: test_cli_run_execute (+1 blank line)

File: tests/aignostics/application/cli_test.py:662

Status: ✅ All good

Change: Added blank line after record_property for improved readability

---

🎯 Code Quality Checks

Linting: ✅ PASSED

make lint
# All checks passed!
# - ruff check: ✅
# - ruff format: ✅ (152 files already formatted)
# - pyright: ✅ (0 errors, 0 warnings)
# - mypy: ✅ (Success: no issues found in 80 source files)

Test Markers: ❌ FAILED (1 unmarked test in main branch)

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# 1/580 tests collected (579 deselected)
# Missing marker: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py::test_custom_env_file_location

Commit Message: ✅ Acceptable

Current:  "chore(test,ketryx): link missing tests with test cases and add missing test for gui health footer"

Follows conventional commit format (though could be more concise).

---

📋 Summary

What's in this PR:

• ✅ New GUI health check test with proper markers and documentation
• ✅ Test ID linking for traceability
• ✅ Minor formatting improvement
• ✅ All linting passes
• ✅ All PR changes properly marked and well-structured

What still needs fixing:

• ❌ BLOCKING: Add @pytest.mark.unit to test_custom_env_file_location in tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py:198

Important note: The unmarked test exists in the main branch and was NOT introduced by this PR. However, it should be fixed to maintain test coverage standards before merging this PR.

---

🔧 How to Fix

Option 1: Fix in this PR (Recommended)

Add the missing marker to tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py:

@pytest.mark.unit
def test_custom_env_file_location(reset_cached_settings, record_property) -> None:
    """Test custom env file location.

Then commit and push:

git add tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py
git commit -m "fix(test): add missing unit marker to test_custom_env_file_location"
git push origin HEAD

Verify the fix:

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# Should output: collected 580 items / 580 deselected / 0 selected

Option 2: Create separate PR

If you prefer to keep this PR focused, create a separate PR to fix the unmarked test. However, this will delay merging this PR until that fix is in place.

---

🎯 Recommendation

Action: Request changes - fix blocking issue, then merge

The PR changes themselves are excellent and demonstrate high quality standards. The new test adds valuable coverage for health status display and is properly structured. Once the pre-existing unmarked test is addressed, this PR will be ready to merge.

Quality assessment:

• ✅ PR changes: Excellent (proper markers, clear documentation, good test design)
• ✅ Code quality: All linting passes
• ❌ Test coverage: One unmarked test blocks CI execution
• ✅ Traceability: Test IDs properly linked

---

[github-actions]

Claude finished @muhabalwan-aginx's task —— View job

---

Re-review Complete: PR #217 Status Update

I've reviewed the latest commit pushed to this PR. Here's what I found:

Tasks

• Read changed files to understand new commits
• Check if blocking issue (missing test marker in settings_test.py) was fixed
• Run unmarked test check to verify all tests have markers
• Run linting to verify code quality
• Review any new changes for issues
• Provide final verdict with actionable next steps

---

⚠️ BLOCKING ISSUE STILL UNRESOLVED

The blocking issue I identified in my previous review has NOT been addressed in the latest commit.

Issue Details

Problem: Test without required category marker

Location: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py:198

Test name: test_custom_env_file_location

Why this is critical: According to repository standards documented in CLAUDE.md:

IMPORTANT: Every test MUST have at least one of: unit, integration, or e2e marker, otherwise it will NOT run in CI. The CI pipeline explicitly runs tests with these markers only.

Verification:

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# Output: collected 580 items / 579 deselected / 1 selected
# The 1 selected test is: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py::test_custom_env_file_location

Required fix: Add @pytest.mark.unit decorator to the test at line 198:

@pytest.mark.unit
def test_custom_env_file_location(reset_cached_settings, record_property) -> None:
    """Test custom env file location.
    ...

Why unit: This test:

• Mocks the environment with mock.patch.dict
• Uses temporary files (no external services)
• Tests settings loading in isolation
• Should pass offline

These characteristics match the definition of a unit test from .github/CLAUDE.md.

---

✅ PR Changes Review

The actual changes in this PR are excellent and properly structured:

1. New Test: test_gui_system_health_shown_and_updated (+26 lines)

File: tests/aignostics/system/gui_test.py:43-67

Status: ✅ All good

Positive findings:

• ✅ Properly marked with @pytest.mark.integration (mocked external services, GUI testing)
• ✅ Correct timeout: @pytest.mark.timeout(timeout=60) (1 minute)
• ✅ Good test design: Verifies health status display across multiple pages
• ✅ Test IDs properly linked: TEST-SYSTEM-GUI-HEALTH, SWR-SYSTEM-GUI-HEALTH-1
• ✅ Clear documentation explaining test purpose and requirements
• ✅ Tests "always visible" requirement by checking multiple pages (/, /system, /dataset/idc)

Test logic:

# Tests health visibility on 3 different pages
pages_to_test = ["/", "/system", "/dataset/idc"]
for page in pages_to_test:
    await user.open(page)
    await user.should_see("Check Launchpad Status", retries=5 * 100)

2. Test ID Linking: test_gui_marimo_extension (1 line)

File: tests/aignostics/notebook/gui_test.py:12

Status: ✅ All good

Change: Added TC-NOTEBOOK-GUI-01 to existing test's tested-item-id record property

3. Formatting: test_cli_run_execute (+1 blank line)

File: tests/aignostics/application/cli_test.py:662

Status: ✅ All good

Change: Added blank line after record_property for improved readability

---

🎯 Code Quality Checks

Linting: ✅ PASSED

make lint
# All checks passed!
# - ruff check: ✅
# - ruff format: ✅ (152 files already formatted)
# - pyright: ✅ (0 errors, 0 warnings)
# - mypy: ✅ (Success: no issues found in 80 source files)

Test Markers: ❌ FAILED (1 unmarked test in main branch)

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# 1/580 tests collected (579 deselected)
# Missing marker: tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py::test_custom_env_file_location

Commit Message: ✅ Acceptable

Current:  "chore(test,ketryx): link missing tests with test cases and add missing test for gui health footer"

Follows conventional commit format (though could be more concise).

---

📋 Summary

What's in this PR:

• ✅ New GUI health check test with proper markers and documentation
• ✅ Test ID linking for traceability
• ✅ Minor formatting improvement
• ✅ All linting passes
• ✅ All PR changes properly marked and well-structured

What still needs fixing:

• ❌ BLOCKING: Add @pytest.mark.unit to test_custom_env_file_location in tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py:198

Important note: The unmarked test exists in the main branch and was NOT introduced by this PR. However, it should be fixed to maintain test coverage standards before merging this PR.

---

🔧 How to Fix

Option 1: Fix in this PR (Recommended)

Add the missing marker to tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py:

@pytest.mark.unit
def test_custom_env_file_location(reset_cached_settings, record_property) -> None:
    """Test custom env file location.

Then commit and push:

git add tests/aignostics/platform/settings_test.py
git commit -m "fix(test): add missing unit marker to test_custom_env_file_location"
git push origin HEAD

Verify the fix:

uv run pytest -m "not unit and not integration and not e2e" --collect-only
# Should output: collected 580 items / 580 deselected / 0 selected

Option 2: Create separate PR

If you prefer to keep this PR focused, create a separate PR to fix the unmarked test. However, this will delay merging this PR until that fix is in place.

---

🎯 Recommendation

Action: Request changes - fix blocking issue, then merge

The PR changes themselves are excellent and demonstrate high quality standards. The new test adds valuable coverage for health status display and is properly structured. Once the pre-existing unmarked test is addressed, this PR will be ready to merge.

Quality assessment:

• ✅ PR changes: Excellent (proper markers, clear documentation, good test design)
• ✅ Code quality: All linting passes
• ❌ Test coverage: One unmarked test blocks CI execution
• ✅ Traceability: Test IDs properly linked

---

[muhabalwan-aginx]

@helmut-hoffer-von-ankershoffen I've added a missing test that is required, that's why I assigned you as a reviewer

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud