-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
using generic H1 decoder instead of specific #235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
using generic H1 decoder instead of specific #235
Conversation
WalkthroughThis PR refactors the testing of a decoding plugin by renaming instances of Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
lib/plugins/Label_H1_PWI.test.ts (1)
4-4: Update test suite description to reflect generic decoder.The test suite description still mentions "PWI" which doesn't align with the move to a generic H1 decoder.
-describe('Label H1 PWI', () => { +describe('Label H1', () => {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
lib/plugins/Label_H1_PWI.test.ts(3 hunks)lib/plugins/Label_H1_PWI.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- lib/plugins/Label_H1_PWI.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
lib/plugins/Label_H1_PWI.test.ts (5)
5-5: LGTM!The plugin type has been correctly updated to use the generic
Label_H1type.
9-9: LGTM!The plugin instantiation has been correctly updated to use the generic
Label_H1class.
40-40: LGTM!The decoder name has been correctly updated to reflect the generic nature of the H1 decoder.
18-18:Details
✅ Verification successful
Verify the intended partial decoding behavior.
The test now expects:
- A 'partial' decode level instead of 'full'
- Remaining text containing structured data (DD/CB segments)
Please confirm if this is the intended behavior:
- Should the DD/CB segments be decoded as well?
- If not, should we document why these segments are left for other decoders?
Also applies to: 30-30
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there are other decoders for DD/CB segments # Search for decoders handling DD/CB segments rg -l "DD|CB" ./lib/plugins/Length of output: 376
Confirm Partial Decoding Behavior for DD/CB Segments
It appears that the change in expected decode level to "partial" in
lib/plugins/Label_H1_PWI.test.tsis intentional. The search results show that several other plugins in the directory (e.g.,Label_H1_FPN.ts,Label_H1_OHMA.test.ts,Label_H1_PRG.test.ts, etc.) reference DD/CB segments, suggesting that these segments are handled separately by dedicated decoders.
- Test Update: The assertion on line 18 now expects a decode level of
'partial', which aligns with the updated decoder behavior.- Remaining Text: The structured DD/CB segments seem to be designed for processing by other decoders. If they are not to be decoded by this particular plugin, it may be helpful to add a code comment or documentation note clarifying this design decision.
Please confirm if:
- The DD/CB segments should indeed remain unprocessed in this context.
- A documentation comment is needed to explain why these segments are reserved for other decoders.
2-2:Details
✅ Verification successful
Verify the import path for Label_H1.
The import statement has been updated to use the generic
Label_H1decoder. Let's verify that the file exists and contains the expected class.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and content of Label_H1.ts # Check if the file exists and contains the Label_H1 class ast-grep --pattern 'export class Label_H1' ./lib/plugins/Label_H1.tsLength of output: 70
Further Verify the Label_H1 Definition
The initial check for the
Label_H1export did not return any output, which is inconclusive. Please run the following script to manually verify that the filelib/plugins/Label_H1.tsexists and contains the expectedLabel_H1class declaration. This will help us confirm that the updated import inLabel_H1_PWI.test.tsreferences a valid and correctly implemented file.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if the file exists and inspect its initial content for the Label_H1 class. if [ -f lib/plugins/Label_H1.ts ]; then echo "Found file: lib/plugins/Label_H1.ts" echo "Displaying the first 30 lines for verification:" head -n 30 lib/plugins/Label_H1.ts else echo "File not found: lib/plugins/Label_H1.ts" fiLength of output: 1408
Import Path Verified for Label_H1
The file
lib/plugins/Label_H1.tsexists and its content confirms that the expectedLabel_H1class is properly defined and exported. The updated import statement inlib/plugins/Label_H1_PWI.test.tscorrectly references this class.
- Verified that
lib/plugins/Label_H1.tscontains the export for theLabel_H1class.- The refactoring to use a generic H1 decoder is correctly implemented.
it wasn't hooked up anyway
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Tests
Chores