Skip to content

🔒 Fix insecure deserialization vulnerability in contactMap.py#422

Merged
akutuva21 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-insecure-pickle-deserialization-5890336867955565148
Jun 2, 2026
Merged

🔒 Fix insecure deserialization vulnerability in contactMap.py#422
akutuva21 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
fix-insecure-pickle-deserialization-5890336867955565148

Conversation

@akutuva21
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What: The vulnerability fixed
Insecure Deserialization via pickle.load in bionetgen/atomizer/contactMap.py. The code was reading potentially untrusted data from binary .dump and .dict files using the pickle module.

⚠️ Risk: The potential impact if left unfixed
The pickle module in Python is inherently unsafe. An attacker could craft a malicious binary file that, when loaded by contactMap.py, executes arbitrary code on the host machine, leading to complete system compromise or data exfiltration.

🛡️ Solution: How the fix addresses the vulnerability
Replaced the insecure pickle.load logic with the secure json.load alternative, which parses data safely without allowing arbitrary object instantiation or code execution. The file reading modes were updated from "rb" (read binary) to "r" (read text). Additionally, the mock dependencies in tests/test_contactMap.py were correctly updated to patch json.load and remove the legacy cPickle mock. (Note: As indicated by the vulnerability rationale, this migration to JSON breaks compatibility with previously generated pickle .dump files).


PR created automatically by Jules for task 5890336867955565148 started by @akutuva21

Changed `pickle.load` to `json.load` when reading `linkArray.dump`, `xmlAnnotationsExtended.dump`, and `.bngl.dict` files to resolve an insecure deserialization vulnerability. Also updated the file open modes from `rb` to `r`. Modified the test file to mock `json` instead of `cPickle`.

Co-authored-by: akutuva21 <44119804+akutuva21@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@akutuva21 akutuva21 marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2026 14:53
@akutuva21 akutuva21 merged commit 8bc75bf into main Jun 2, 2026
@akutuva21 akutuva21 deleted the fix-insecure-pickle-deserialization-5890336867955565148 branch June 2, 2026 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant