Conversation
WalkthroughDocumentation updates: network latency phrasing changed to "within/across clusters" with within-cluster latency raised to ≤10 ms; upgrade and upload docs clarified cluster-targeting behavior for Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant User
participant CLI as "violet CLI (push)"
participant Global as "Global Cluster"
participant Workload as "Workload Cluster"
Note over User,CLI: User runs violet push / Create-only CRs
User->>CLI: violet push --packages ... [--clusters <name>?]
alt No --clusters provided
CLI->>Global: upload packages / create CRs (default)
Note over Global: Operators/ModuleInfo placed in Global cluster
else --clusters provided
CLI->>Workload: upload packages / create CRs for specified cluster(s)
Note over Workload: Operators/CRs targeted to workload cluster(s)
end
CLI->>User: success / warnings (e.g., cluster-name validation, version notes)
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/en/install/prepare/prerequisites.mdx (1)
160-177: Align network vs. cluster terminology across the Network Configuration table.The Network Latency row (line 166) now uses cluster-centric terminology ("within the same cluster" / "across clusters"), while the Network Speed row (line 162) still uses network-centric terminology ("same network" / "cross-network"). For consistency and clarity, update the Network Speed requirement to use matching terminology—either both use "cluster" or both use "network" depending on the intended scope.
Consider whether "cluster" or "network" is the more precise boundary for these requirements in your deployment architecture.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/en/install/prepare/prerequisites.mdx(1 hunks)docs/en/upgrade/upgrade_global_cluster.mdx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/en/install/prepare/prerequisites.mdx (1)
165-167: Verify and clarify the rationale for the within-cluster latency threshold increase.The within-cluster network latency threshold has been significantly relaxed from ≤2 ms to ≤10 ms. While the terminology shift from "network" to "cluster" improves clarity, the 5x increase in the acceptable latency threshold warrants explicit documentation of the change rationale—whether it reflects updated performance benchmarks, deployment experience, or alignment with realistic infrastructure constraints.
Consider adding a note explaining why this threshold was adjusted to help users understand the change and assess its applicability to their environments.
docs/en/upgrade/upgrade_global_cluster.mdx (2)
63-67: Helpful clarification for multi-cluster upgrade workflows.The new INFO directive clearly addresses a critical upgrade scenario—ensuring that when using the
--clustersparameter with "Create only CRs" action, users understand the behavior when the parameter is omitted. This guidance prevents a common mistake that would leave workload cluster operators unupgraded. The placement immediately following the relevant command context is ideal.
63-67: Cross-reference link verified—no issues found.The anchor
#only_create_crexists at line 187 ofdocs/en/extend/upload_package.mdxwith correct Markdown syntax. The link in the new INFO directive resolves correctly, and the referenced section heading matches the link text. The new guidance is accurate and properly positioned.
Summary by CodeRabbit