Hi there, 1st of all thanks for this awesome work !
Since I've 'doxed' it for the HyMPS project (under AUDIO section \ Treatments page \ Alignment/synch), can you please add a GH-compliant license file for it ?
As you know, expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let anyone better/faster understand how to reuse/adapt/modify sources (and not only) in other open projects and vice-versa.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, license file omission obviously causes an inconsistent generation of the relative badge too:
(badge-generator URL: https://badgen.net/github/license/allisonnicoledeal/VideoSync)
You can easily set a standardized one through the GH's license wizard tool.
The GH organization I'm a part of does strongly believes that any open source code can be useful even if it's un-updated/maintained but, if it's this project case, I recommend you to set - after choosing a license - this repository as archived (so the "no longer developed" status will be clearer for anyone).
Last but not least: the noprofit foundation I'm collaborating with (FORART) started to store development-deadlocked third-party source codes in order to preserve them from the oblivion, so - if you're considering to get rid of this repository - I invite you to donate it to them (using the GH Transfer function) instead of deleting it.
Thanks again,
hope this "issue" can helps/inspires !
Hi there, 1st of all thanks for this awesome work !
Since I've 'doxed' it for the HyMPS project (under AUDIO section \ Treatments page \ Alignment/synch), can you please add a GH-compliant license file for it ?
As you know, expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let anyone better/faster understand how to reuse/adapt/modify sources (and not only) in other open projects and vice-versa.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, license file omission obviously causes an inconsistent generation of the relative badge too:
(badge-generator URL: https://badgen.net/github/license/allisonnicoledeal/VideoSync)
You can easily set a standardized one through the GH's license wizard tool.
The GH organization I'm a part of does strongly believes that any open source code can be useful even if it's un-updated/maintained but, if it's this project case, I recommend you to set - after choosing a license - this repository as archived (so the "no longer developed" status will be clearer for anyone).
Last but not least: the noprofit foundation I'm collaborating with (FORART) started to store development-deadlocked third-party source codes in order to preserve them from the oblivion, so - if you're considering to get rid of this repository - I invite you to donate it to them (using the GH Transfer function) instead of deleting it.
Thanks again,
hope this "issue" can helps/inspires !