Skip to content

fix: set explicit model in CI workflows#879

Merged
Gkrumbach07 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/ci-workflow-model-names
Mar 10, 2026
Merged

fix: set explicit model in CI workflows#879
Gkrumbach07 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
fix/ci-workflow-model-names

Conversation

@Gkrumbach07
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Added model: claude-sonnet-4-5 to all ambient-action usages in CI workflows
  • Affected workflows: pr-fixer.yml, pr-merge-review.yml, feedback-loop.yml
  • Prevents 400 errors from the backend rejecting the invalid default model "sonnet"

Test plan

  • PR fixer workflow creates sessions successfully
  • Feedback loop workflow creates sessions successfully

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

All workflows now pass `model: claude-sonnet-4-5` to avoid relying
on the backend default which was set to the invalid short name "sonnet".

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 10, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1cd0d4d1-89e1-4104-a2a4-d66b42fa3cf0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3ee06fd and d9d671d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/feedback-loop.yml
  • .github/workflows/pr-fixer.yml
  • .github/workflows/pr-merge-review.yml

Walkthrough

Added a model: claude-sonnet-4-5 parameter to ambient-action workflow steps across three GitHub workflow files: feedback-loop.yml, pr-fixer.yml (two invocations), and pr-merge-review.yml. No functional logic changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Workflow Model Configuration
.github/workflows/feedback-loop.yml, .github/workflows/pr-fixer.yml, .github/workflows/pr-merge-review.yml
Added model: claude-sonnet-4-5 parameter to ambient-action inputs across three workflows. pr-fixer.yml receives the parameter in two separate invocations (single-PR and batch fix paths).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'fix: set explicit model in CI workflows' directly and clearly summarizes the main change: adding an explicit model parameter to CI workflow configurations.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, detailing which model parameter was added, which workflows were affected, and the rationale for the change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/ci-workflow-model-names

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Gkrumbach07 Gkrumbach07 merged commit 0369c87 into main Mar 10, 2026
7 checks passed
@Gkrumbach07 Gkrumbach07 deleted the fix/ci-workflow-model-names branch March 10, 2026 21:15
@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mergify bot commented Mar 10, 2026

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for d9d671d.

🟢 All jobs passed!

But CI Insights is watching 👀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant