Skip to content

Conversation

@eddierichter-amd
Copy link
Collaborator

Added gaia eval fix-code CLI helper to run the new fix-code testbench (local model or Claude) with prompt-engineering, edit_file, line-range, and tuning options wired through the handler in src/gaia/cli.py. Introduced src/gaia/eval/fix_code_testbench module plus README and sample bug fixtures to experiment with and iterate on prompt designs for automated code fixes, writing patched output and showing diffs.

… agent debugging to play with prompts and tool design of how the agent can fix issues in generated code
@eddierichter-amd eddierichter-amd force-pushed the eddie/fix-code-testbench-eddie-fork branch from da57b29 to 6a76899 Compare January 9, 2026 19:15
@eddierichter-amd eddierichter-amd changed the title Adding a script to allow us to experiment with prompt engineering for agent debugging to play with prompts and tool design of how the agent can fix issues in generated code Adding Fix-Code Microbenchmark Jan 9, 2026
@eddierichter-amd eddierichter-amd self-assigned this Jan 9, 2026
@amd amd deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jan 10, 2026
@amd amd deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jan 10, 2026
@amd amd deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jan 10, 2026
@amd amd deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jan 10, 2026
@amd amd deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jan 10, 2026
@amd amd deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jan 12, 2026
@kovtcharov-amd
Copy link
Collaborator

@claude review this PR.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Claude finished @kovtcharov-amd's task —— View job


Reviewing PR #159: Adding Fix-Code Microbenchmark

  • Read PR diff and changed files list
  • Review CLI changes in src/gaia/cli.py
  • Review main testbench implementation
  • Review README documentation
  • Review sample bug fixtures
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Summary

This PR adds a well-designed testbench for evaluating code-fixing prompts against LLM models. The implementation is clean, follows GAIA patterns, and includes good documentation with real-world examples.

Positive Aspects

  1. Comprehensive CLI Integration - The CLI changes are well-structured with good help text and examples
  2. Thorough Documentation - The README provides detailed scenarios demonstrating failure modes and solutions
  3. Good Test Cases - Bug fixtures cover common issues (off-by-one, typos, mutable defaults, missing returns, TypeScript types)
  4. Proper Error Handling - Import errors provide clear guidance on missing dependencies
  5. Copyright Headers - All new files have appropriate AMD copyright headers

Issues and Suggestions

High Priority

  1. Missing __init__.py (src/gaia/eval/fix_code_testbench/__init__.py)

    • While Python 3 namespace packages work without it, adding an __init__.py would be more explicit and consistent with other GAIA modules (e.g., src/gaia/agents/, src/gaia/apps/)
  2. Markdown Syntax Error (README.md:176-181)

    gaia eval fix-code \
        mispelled_variable/mispelled_variable.py \

    Missing opening triple backticks before the code block

  3. Copyright Year Inconsistency - Some fixture files use 2025-2026 which is unusual:

    • missing_return_bug.py:1: Copyright(C) 2025-2026
    • mutable_default_argument_bug.py:1: Copyright(C) 2025-2026
    • off_by_one_bug.py:1: Copyright(C) 2025-2026
    • WorkoutForm.tsx:1: Copyright(C) 2025-2026

    Should be 2024-2025 to match other files

Medium Priority

  1. Function Name Shadows Builtin (off_by_one_bug.py:7)

    def sum(n):

    This shadows Python's built-in sum(). Consider renaming to sum_first_n() as shown in the README examples

  2. README Typo (README.md:292)

    ### Real-World Use Case: TypeScript Type InfereOnly error
    

    Should be: "TypeScript Type Inference Error"

  3. Hardcoded Claude Model Version (fix_code_testbench.py:782)

    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",

    Consider making this configurable or using a constant

Low Priority / Suggestions

  1. Potential None Return (fix_code_testbench.py:764)

    return response.choices[0].message.content.strip()

    .content could be None. Consider adding a guard:

    content = response.choices[0].message.content
    return content.strip() if content else ""
  2. CLI Example Path Inconsistency (cli.py:22-25)
    The epilog examples use util/fix_code_testbench/ but the actual location is src/gaia/eval/fix_code_testbench/

  3. Missing Type Annotations - The main() function uses untyped args. Consider adding -> None return type (already present) but the internal logic could benefit from more explicit typing

Overall Assessment

This is a solid contribution that adds valuable tooling for prompt engineering experimentation. The design follows GAIA patterns and the documentation is thorough. Once the minor issues above are addressed (especially the copyright years and markdown syntax), this is ready to merge.


@amd amd deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jan 12, 2026
@kovtcharov-amd
Copy link
Collaborator

@claude review this PR.

@github-actions github-actions bot added cli CLI changes eval Evaluation framework changes performance Performance-critical changes labels Jan 12, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 12, 2026

Claude finished @kovtcharov-amd's task —— View job


Reviewing PR #159: Adding Fix-Code Microbenchmark

  • Read PR diff and changed files
  • Review CLI changes in src/gaia/cli.py
  • Review main testbench implementation
  • Review README documentation
  • Review sample bug fixtures
  • Check for issues from previous review
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Summary

This is a well-designed testbench for evaluating code-fixing prompts against LLM models. The implementation follows GAIA patterns and includes thorough documentation with real-world examples.

Issues to Address

🔴 High Priority

  1. Missing __init__.py (src/gaia/eval/fix_code_testbench/)

    • Add an empty __init__.py to be consistent with other GAIA modules (e.g., src/gaia/agents/, src/gaia/apps/)
  2. Markdown Syntax Error (README.md:176-181)

    gaia eval fix-code \
        mispelled_variable/mispelled_variable.py \

    Missing opening triple backticks before this code block

  3. Copyright Year Inconsistency - These files use 2025-2026:

    • missing_return_bug.py:1
    • mutable_default_argument_bug.py:1
    • off_by_one_bug.py:1
    • WorkoutForm.tsx:1

    Should be 2024-2025 to match other files and fix_code_testbench.py

🟡 Medium Priority

  1. Function Name Shadows Builtin (off_by_one_bug.py:7)

    def sum(n):

    This shadows Python's built-in sum(). Consider renaming to sum_first_n() as shown in the README examples

  2. README Typo (README.md:292)

    ### Real-World Use Case: TypeScript Type InfereOnly error
    

    Should be: "TypeScript Type Inference Error"

  3. Hardcoded Claude Model Version (fix_code_testbench.py:782)

    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",

    Consider making this configurable via constant or CLI argument

  4. CLI Example Path Mismatch (cli.py:22-25)
    The epilog examples reference util/fix_code_testbench/ but the actual location is src/gaia/eval/fix_code_testbench/

🟢 Low Priority

  1. Potential None Return (fix_code_testbench.py:764)
    return response.choices[0].message.content.strip()
    .content could be None. Consider adding a guard:
    content = response.choices[0].message.content
    return content.strip() if content else ""

Positive Aspects

  • Clean CLI integration with comprehensive help text and examples
  • Thorough README documenting failure modes and solutions
  • Good test cases covering common bugs (off-by-one, typos, mutable defaults, missing returns, TypeScript types)
  • Proper error handling with clear guidance on missing dependencies
  • Appropriate AMD copyright headers on most files

Overall Assessment

Solid contribution adding valuable tooling for prompt engineering experimentation. Once the high-priority issues (missing __init__.py, markdown syntax, copyright years) and the CLI path inconsistency are fixed, this is ready to merge.


@eddierichter-amd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@claude review this PR.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

Claude finished @eddierichter-amd's task —— View job


Reviewing PR #159: Adding Fix-Code Microbenchmark

  • Read PR diff and changed files
  • Review CLI changes in src/gaia/cli.py
  • Review main testbench implementation
  • Review README documentation
  • Review sample bug fixtures
  • Check status of previously reported issues
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Summary

This PR adds a well-designed testbench for evaluating code-fixing prompts against LLM models (local or Claude). The implementation is clean, follows GAIA patterns, and includes thorough documentation with real-world examples.

Status of Previously Reported Issues

Issue Status
Missing __init__.py Fixed - Added in this revision
Markdown syntax error (missing backticks) Fixed - Line 176 now uses proper code block syntax
README typo "InfereOnly error" Fixed - Now reads "TypeScript Type Error" (line 145)

Remaining Issues

🔴 High Priority

  1. Copyright Year Inconsistency - All new files use 2025-2026:

    • __init__.py:1
    • fix_code_testbench.py:3
    • off_by_one_bug.py:1
    • missing_return_bug.py:1
    • mutable_default_argument_bug.py:1
    • mispelled_variable.py:2
    • WorkoutForm.tsx:1

    Should be 2024-2025 to match other GAIA files

🟡 Medium Priority

  1. Function Name Shadows Builtin (off_by_one_bug.py:7)

    def sum(n):

    This shadows Python's built-in sum(). Consider renaming to sum_first_n() as shown in the README examples - this is a test case, but students of the testbench may copy this pattern

  2. CLI Example Path Mismatch (cli.py:1600)

    gaia eval fix-code util/fix_code_testbench/off_by_one_bug/off_by_one_bug.py

    Should reference the actual location: src/gaia/eval/fix_code_testbench/

  3. Hardcoded Claude Model Version (fix_code_testbench.py:329)

    model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",

    Consider making this configurable via CLI argument or constant

🟢 Low Priority

  1. Potential None Return (fix_code_testbench.py:311)
    return response.choices[0].message.content.strip()
    .content could be None. Consider adding a guard:
    content = response.choices[0].message.content
    return content.strip() if content else ""

Positive Aspects

  • Clean CLI integration with comprehensive help text and examples
  • Thorough README documenting failure modes and solutions
  • Good test cases covering common bugs (off-by-one, typos, mutable defaults, missing returns, TypeScript types)
  • Proper error handling with clear guidance on missing dependencies
  • __init__.py now present for consistency

Overall Assessment

Solid contribution adding valuable tooling for prompt engineering experimentation. The critical issues from previous reviews (missing __init__.py, markdown syntax, README typo) have been addressed. Once the copyright years and CLI path examples are fixed, this is ready to merge.


@eddierichter-amd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@claude I will fix the headers in another PR. Review this PR, I believe I have fixed all of the high and medium priority issues.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

Claude finished @eddierichter-amd's task —— View job


Reviewing PR #159: Adding Fix-Code Microbenchmark

  • Read PR diff and changed files
  • Check status of previously reported issues
  • Verify high and medium priority fixes
  • Provide final assessment

Summary

Good progress on addressing the previously reported issues! Most items have been fixed.

Status of Previously Reported Issues

Issue Priority Status
Missing __init__.py 🔴 High ✅ Fixed
Markdown syntax error (missing backticks) 🔴 High ✅ Fixed
README typo "InfereOnly error" 🟡 Medium ✅ Fixed - now reads "TypeScript Type Error"
Copyright year inconsistency 🔴 High ⏸️ Deferred (per PR author)
Hardcoded Claude model version 🟡 Medium ✅ Addressed - now uses CLAUDE_MODEL_NAME constant
CLI example path mismatch 🟡 Medium Still present
Function name shadows builtin (sum) 🟡 Medium ⏸️ Intentional test case
Potential None return 🟢 Low Not addressed

Remaining Issue

🟡 CLI Example Path Mismatch (cli.py:1600)

The example path in the CLI epilog is incorrect:

gaia eval fix-code src/gaia/eval/fix_code_testbench/util/fix_code_testbench/off_by_one_bug/off_by_one_bug.py

Should be:

gaia eval fix-code src/gaia/eval/fix_code_testbench/off_by_one_bug/off_by_one_bug.py

The path has an extra util/fix_code_testbench/ segment that doesn't exist.

Overall Assessment

Almost ready to merge. Once the CLI example path is corrected, this is good to go. The copyright years can be addressed in the follow-up PR as mentioned.


@eddierichter-amd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@claude good catch. I just fixed cli.py. Anything else that I missed?

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

Claude finished @eddierichter-amd's task —— View job


Final Review of PR #159

  • Check CLI path fix
  • Verify all high and medium priority issues addressed
  • Final assessment

All High and Medium Priority Issues Addressed ✅

Issue Status
Missing __init__.py ✅ Fixed
Markdown syntax error ✅ Fixed
README typo "InfereOnly error" ✅ Fixed
CLI example path mismatch ✅ Fixed - now correctly uses src/gaia/eval/fix_code_testbench/
Hardcoded Claude model version ✅ Fixed - now uses CLAUDE_MODEL_NAME constant
Copyright years ⏸️ Deferred to follow-up PR
Function sum shadows builtin ⏸️ Intentional test case

Remaining Low Priority Item

🟢 Potential None return (fix_code_testbench.py:312) - .content could theoretically be None, but this is minor and unlikely in practice.

Ready to Merge

All high and medium priority issues have been addressed. The PR is ready to merge. Nice work!


@eddierichter-amd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@kovtcharov-amd this passed Claude's review. Let me know what you think.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Documentation changes label Jan 13, 2026
@eddierichter-amd eddierichter-amd added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 13, 2026
Merged via the queue into amd:main with commit ec927a6 Jan 14, 2026
63 of 65 checks passed
@eddierichter-amd eddierichter-amd deleted the eddie/fix-code-testbench-eddie-fork branch January 14, 2026 00:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cli CLI changes documentation Documentation changes eval Evaluation framework changes performance Performance-critical changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants