Skip to content

Conversation

@garanj
Copy link
Contributor

@garanj garanj commented Dec 19, 2025

No description provided.

@garanj garanj requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2025 10:44
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @garanj, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request standardizes the formatting of exclusion markers within several watch face XML configuration files. The change involves adding the silent keyword to START_EXCLUDE tags, which likely refines how these sections are processed or ignored, potentially suppressing warnings or output related to the excluded content for a cleaner build or development experience.

Highlights

  • XML Exclude Tag Formatting: The <!-- [START_EXCLUDE] --> comment tags in various watch face XML configuration files have been updated to <!-- [START_EXCLUDE silent] -->.
  • Consistency Across Files: This formatting change has been applied consistently across all affected XML files, ensuring uniform handling of excluded content.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a consistent change across several XML resource files for watch faces. The modification adds a silent parameter to [START_EXCLUDE] comment tags, likely to adjust the behavior of a documentation or build tool. The changes are applied uniformly and correctly in all modified files. The pull request appears complete and correct according to its goal.

@garanj garanj merged commit a6ffb7b into main Dec 19, 2025
5 checks passed
@garanj garanj deleted the watchface-silent-fix branch December 19, 2025 11:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants