Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @cy245, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request integrates foundational support for digital credential management within the identity module. It updates the build configuration to include necessary dependencies and provides a comprehensive set of code snippets for developers to implement features related to OpenID4VP, SD-JWT, and mDOC credentials, enabling the creation, registration, and handling of digital credentials. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces new dependencies for digital credentials and a new Kotlin file, DigitalCredentialHolder.kt, which provides snippets for handling digital credentials. While the dependency additions are straightforward, the new Kotlin file contains several placeholder implementations, hardcoded values, and potential runtime issues that need to be addressed before this code can be considered production-ready. Specifically, there are broad exception catches, undefined variables, and logic that could lead to crashes or incorrect behavior.
...ntialmanager/src/main/java/com/example/identity/credentialmanager/DigitalCredentialHolder.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ntialmanager/src/main/java/com/example/identity/credentialmanager/DigitalCredentialHolder.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ntialmanager/src/main/java/com/example/identity/credentialmanager/DigitalCredentialHolder.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ntialmanager/src/main/java/com/example/identity/credentialmanager/DigitalCredentialHolder.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ntialmanager/src/main/java/com/example/identity/credentialmanager/DigitalCredentialHolder.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ntialmanager/src/main/java/com/example/identity/credentialmanager/DigitalCredentialHolder.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ntialmanager/src/main/java/com/example/identity/credentialmanager/DigitalCredentialHolder.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ntialmanager/src/main/java/com/example/identity/credentialmanager/DigitalCredentialHolder.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ntialmanager/src/main/java/com/example/identity/credentialmanager/DigitalCredentialHolder.kt
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...ntialmanager/src/main/java/com/example/identity/credentialmanager/DigitalCredentialHolder.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
vinishavathwani
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Did a perfunctory review, LGTM.
|
@yrezgui or @kkuan2011 as owners if you could please approve the we can move ahead with the DAC page |
| implementation(libs.androidx.credentials.play.services.auth) | ||
| // [END android_identity_gradle_dependencies] | ||
|
|
||
| // In your app module's build.gradle: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this comment needed if it's not shown in an snippet? (it should be build.gradle.kts instead right?)
kkuan2011
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think there's a merge conflict on the version catalog file, other LGTM
No description provided.