| Item |
Version |
| generator-angular-fullstack |
4.1 |
| Node |
6.9.1 |
| npm |
3.10.8 |
| Operating System |
Windows 7 Enterprise |
| Item |
Answer |
| Transpiler |
TypeScript |
| Markup |
HTML |
| CSS |
LESS |
| Router |
ui-router |
| Client Tests |
Jasmine |
| DB |
None |
| Auth |
N |
While I understand that incremental build time (e.g. during gulp serve) is not fixed, it seems to scale pretty poorly with project size.
In our case, we work on a mid-sized project (approx 40k+ lines JS, 2k+ LESS, not including deps). Changing a source triggers an incremental builds which takes 5-10 seconds, and really hits the CPU hard (I have a Dell M4800, never had the fans run so high before).
I am not a webpack guru, but is there no way to tweak the chunk system to make this more efficient? Our modules are relatively small (about 500-1k JS each). Right now it feels as if the entire code base is being recompiled rather than the part which changed.
While I understand that incremental build time (e.g. during
gulp serve) is not fixed, it seems to scale pretty poorly with project size.In our case, we work on a mid-sized project (approx 40k+ lines JS, 2k+ LESS, not including deps). Changing a source triggers an incremental builds which takes 5-10 seconds, and really hits the CPU hard (I have a Dell M4800, never had the fans run so high before).
I am not a webpack guru, but is there no way to tweak the chunk system to make this more efficient? Our modules are relatively small (about 500-1k JS each). Right now it feels as if the entire code base is being recompiled rather than the part which changed.