docs: normalize product name casing across docs#68552
Open
erkamyaman wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
Open
docs: normalize product name casing across docs#68552erkamyaman wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
erkamyaman wants to merge 1 commit intoangular:mainfrom
Conversation
Several user-facing docs, tooltips, and tutorial code samples used non-canonical spellings of product names. This normalizes them to the form each project uses for its own brand.
JeanMeche
approved these changes
May 4, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Several user-facing docs, tooltips, and tutorial code samples used non-canonical spellings of product names. This normalizes them to the form each project uses for its own brand.
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Several user-facing docs, tooltips, and tutorial code samples use
non-canonical spellings of product names:
What is the current behavior?
Several user-facing docs, tooltips, and tutorial code samples use
non-canonical spellings of product names:
github(lowercase) in a footer tooltip → should beGitHubTypescriptin prose → should beTypeScriptNodeJSin a tutorial doc and in an update-guide step label →should be
Node.jsStackOverflowin a saved issue reply and a package README →should be
Stack OverflowMacOSin prose and in a@fortutorial code sample (whichrenders to the DOM) → should be
macOSNPMin prose, including a section heading and an update-guidestep label → should be
npmJQueryin prose (TS type names from@types/jqueryleftuntouched) → should be
jQuery[less]and[stylus]link text in the CSS preprocessor list →should be
[Less]and[Stylus]HttpTitle-Cased in a section heading, table cell, and linktext even though HTTP is an uppercase acronym and the rest of
the docs consistently say "HTTP client" / "HTTP interceptor"
GitHub pages(lowercase 'p') in the deployment table → shouldbe
GitHub PagesStackblitzin prose across the kitchen-sink page and anexample readme → should be
StackBlitzWebcontainerin two testing docs → should beWebContainerWhat is the new behavior?
Each reference uses the canonical spelling each project publishes for itself:
JQueryTypeScript type from@types/jqueryis left untouched)adev/src/content/guide/http/overview.mdDoes this PR introduce a breaking change?