README incorrectly claims Claude Code doesn't have LSP support

[HackAttack]

Description

Claude code does have LSP support, documented here, so this is not a difference between the two products.

Plugins

No response

OpenCode version

No response

Steps to reproduce

No response

Screenshot and/or share link

No response

Operating System

No response

Terminal

No response

[github-actions]

This issue doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines.

What needs to be fixed:

• The Description field contains only a bare URL with no explanation. Please describe what the README currently says, what is incorrect about it, and what it should say instead.
• Steps to reproduce and other context fields are empty. Even for documentation issues, please provide enough context for maintainers to verify and act on the report.

Please edit this issue to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed.

---

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

• Docs suggest LSP is enabled by default #23566: Docs suggest LSP is enabled by default (similar concern about LSP documentation accuracy)

If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know.

[github-actions]

Thanks for updating the issue! The description now clearly explains the problem. The compliance label has been removed.