Skip to content

Conversation

@PProfizi
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #2750

@PProfizi PProfizi self-assigned this Nov 17, 2025
@PProfizi PProfizi added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 17, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.65217% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 82.44%. Comparing base (e19a7d9) to head (e9c5711).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2755      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.42%   82.44%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          92       92              
  Lines       10917    10931      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits         8998     9012      +14     
  Misses       1919     1919              

pyansys-ci-bot and others added 2 commits November 17, 2025 11:24
…uts_class (#2756)

Co-authored-by: PProfizi <100710998+PProfizi@users.noreply.github.com>
…uts_class (#2757)

Co-authored-by: PProfizi <100710998+PProfizi@users.noreply.github.com>
@PProfizi PProfizi requested a review from a team as a code owner November 17, 2025 12:01
@rafacanton rafacanton self-requested a review November 17, 2025 15:18
@PProfizi PProfizi enabled auto-merge (squash) November 18, 2025 19:37
@PProfizi PProfizi merged commit f8d9190 into main Nov 18, 2025
45 checks passed
@PProfizi PProfizi deleted the fix/fix_generated_operators_outputs_class branch November 18, 2025 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

operator.outputs does not create an instance of the specific Outputs class, but the generic Outputs one

4 participants