Resolved doc issues

[hpohekar]

1. Resolved Case class is undocumented #1484 n.b. this has since been updated to CaseFile following conflict resolution

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Resolved data_transfer module has unused docstring #1465

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Resolved fluent_connection module only exposes MonitorThread #1457

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Resolved asynchronous doc deeply nested #1453

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Resolved misleading session module doc #1456

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. Resolved Tree of contents is in a keyhole #1460

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. Resolved Unclickable attributes in session classes #1459

[hpohekar]

We have resolved regression related to navigation issue.

Corrected -

[hpohekar]

@seanpearsonuk

We have made _BaseMeshing public,

otherwise it was generating empty page as follows -

[hpohekar]

@seanpearsonuk

We have added and restructured .rst files to resolve #1459.

[seanpearsonuk]

@hpohekar I think you will have conflicts. case.py is now case_file.py. Case is CaseFile.

[hpohekar]

@hpohekar I think you will have conflicts. case.py is now case_file.py. Case is CaseFile.

@seanpearsonuk

We have resolved it.

[hpohekar]

@hpohekar I think you will have conflicts. case.py is now case_file.py. Case is CaseFile.

@seanpearsonuk

We have resolved it.

[seanpearsonuk]

@hpohekar Some follow-up comments (sorry, I was still going through the updated docs)

• Wherever we mention case reader, we could mention instead CaseFile class.
• It would be useful if we can click on FluentConnection from <Session_class>.__init__(fluent_connection : FluentConnection)
• This line "PRESENTLY SAME AS MESHING WITHOUT THE SWITCH TO SOLVER*" in session_pure_meshing is not needed (at least not in this format)

I will create a new issue to cover this work.

[hpohekar]

@hpohekar Some follow-up comments (sorry, I was still going through the updated docs)

• Wherever we mention case reader, we could mention instead CaseFile class.
• It would be useful if we can click on FluentConnection from <Session_class>.__init__(fluent_connection : FluentConnection)
• This line "PRESENTLY SAME AS MESHING WITHOUT THE SWITCH TO SOLVER*" in session_pure_meshing is not needed (at least not in this format)

I will create a new issue to cover this work.

No issues at all. We will try to resolve this as soon as possible. Thank you.