Fix the inefficient usage of gnet #367
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Along with some code improvements.
antonputra
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2024
Owner
antonputra
left a comment
antonputra
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@panjf2000 I appreciate your help! I'll rerun a test in a week.
gnet vs fasthttp vs hertz vs net/http
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, great project over here!
However, the code of the 2nd test for
gnetdoesn't follow the best practices, which brings down the performance significantly. Let's fix it!Along with some code improvements.