Skip to content

Comments

GO-3747 stacktrace logger improvements#1383

Merged
fat-fellow merged 6 commits intomainfrom
go-3747-improve-stacktrace-debug
Jul 15, 2024
Merged

GO-3747 stacktrace logger improvements#1383
fat-fellow merged 6 commits intomainfrom
go-3747-improve-stacktrace-debug

Conversation

@requilence
Copy link
Contributor

  • send most actual stacktrace when request is finished
  • double check if it really contains the method goroutine

@requilence requilence requested a review from fat-fellow July 10, 2024 16:39
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 10, 2024

Walkthrough

This update introduces enhanced monitoring and debugging capabilities. Key changes include the ability to track and log long-running gRPC unary requests using atomic operations and predefined time intervals, a new function to compress byte slices, and an updated method to handle stack traces more efficiently. Additionally, a new event type for logging long method executions is implemented.

Changes

File Change Summary
metrics/interceptors.go Added atomic monitoring for long-running gRPC unary requests.
util/debug/debug.go Introduced CompressBytes function and updated StackCompact to use it.
metrics/events.go Introduced LongMethodEvent type with methods for backend retrieval and fast JSON marshaling.
util/debug/debug_test.go Added a test function to verify the parsing of goroutine stack traces.

Poem

In the world of code, where bytes do spin,
A rabbit hops with a cheeky grin.
It watches time, compresses stacks,
Ensures that nothing falls through the cracks.
With metrics sharp and warnings clear,
Debugging bliss is ever near.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29da0d8 and 6bd5f1e.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • metrics/interceptors.go (2 hunks)
  • util/debug/debug.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: lint
util/debug/debug.go

[failure] 35-35:
Error return value of gz.Write is not checked (errcheck)

Additional comments not posted (4)
util/debug/debug.go (1)

29-30: LGTM!

The StackCompact function now uses CompressBytes to compress the stack trace.

metrics/interceptors.go (3)

10-10: LGTM!

The import of go.uber.org/atomic is necessary for the new atomic.String variable.


24-26: LGTM!

The variables UnaryTraceCollections and UnaryWarningInProgressIndex are correctly declared and initialized.


71-106: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The SharedLongMethodsInterceptor function includes the new logic for monitoring and logging long-running gRPC unary requests using atomic.String. The changes are approved.

However, ensure that the function is used correctly in the codebase.

Verification successful

Verify the context around the usage of SharedLongMethodsInterceptor.

The SharedLongMethodsInterceptor function is used in metrics/interceptors.go and clientlibrary/service/lib.go. Ensure that these usages are consistent with the new logic introduced.


The function SharedLongMethodsInterceptor is used correctly in the codebase.

The usage of SharedLongMethodsInterceptor in metrics/interceptors.go and clientlibrary/service/lib.go is consistent with the new logic introduced. Both usages are correctly integrating the new monitoring and logging functionality.

  • metrics/interceptors.go: Used within LongMethodsInterceptor.
  • clientlibrary/service/lib.go: Used within registerClientCommandsHandler.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `SharedLongMethodsInterceptor` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct usage of the new logic.
rg --type go -A 5 $'SharedLongMethodsInterceptor'

Length of output: 1121


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Analyze the context around the usage of `SharedLongMethodsInterceptor`.

# Extract and display the relevant context in `metrics/interceptors.go`.
rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'SharedLongMethodsInterceptor' metrics/interceptors.go

# Extract and display the relevant context in `clientlibrary/service/lib.go`.
rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'SharedLongMethodsInterceptor' clientlibrary/service/lib.go

Length of output: 1987

Comment on lines +32 to 36
func CompressBytes(s []byte) string {
var buf bytes.Buffer
gz := gzip.NewWriter(&buf)
_, _ = gz.Write(Stack(allGoroutines))
_, _ = gz.Write(s)
_ = gz.Close()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check the error return value of gz.Write.

The error return value of gz.Write is not checked. This could lead to unnoticed errors during the compression process.

-	_, _ = gz.Write(s)
+	if _, err := gz.Write(s); err != nil {
+		return ""
+	}
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
func CompressBytes(s []byte) string {
var buf bytes.Buffer
gz := gzip.NewWriter(&buf)
_, _ = gz.Write(Stack(allGoroutines))
_, _ = gz.Write(s)
_ = gz.Close()
func CompressBytes(s []byte) string {
var buf bytes.Buffer
gz := gzip.NewWriter(&buf)
if _, err := gz.Write(s); err != nil {
return ""
}
_ = gz.Close()
Tools
GitHub Check: lint

[failure] 35-35:
Error return value of gz.Write is not checked (errcheck)


var (
// every duration will be added to the previous ones
UnaryTraceCollections = []time.Duration{time.Second * 3, time.Second * 7, time.Second * 10, time.Second * 30, time.Second * 50} // 3, 10, 20, 50, 100
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

misleading comment
// 3, 10, 20, 50, 100
this is not true

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fat-fellow because it runs after each other, the durations are cumulative

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 12, 2024

New Coverage 46.8% of statements
Patch Coverage 34.5% of changed statements (20/58)

Coverage provided by https://github.com/seriousben/go-patch-cover-action

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6bd5f1e and d10d278.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • metrics/events.go (1 hunks)
  • metrics/interceptors.go (2 hunks)
  • util/debug/debug.go (3 hunks)
  • util/debug/debug_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • metrics/interceptors.go
Additional context used
golangci-lint
util/debug/debug.go

[error] 43-43: wrapperFunc: use strings.ReplaceAll method in strings.Replace(addressPattern.ReplaceAllString(line, ""), "\t", "", -1)

(gocritic)

GitHub Check: lint
util/debug/debug.go

[failure] 43-43:
wrapperFunc: use strings.ReplaceAll method in strings.Replace(addressPattern.ReplaceAllString(line, ""), "\t", "", -1) (gocritic)


[failure] 74-74:
Error return value of gz.Write is not checked (errcheck)

Additional comments not posted (2)
util/debug/debug_test.go (1)

1-14: LGTM!

The new test function Test correctly verifies the parsing of goroutine stack traces using require.Equal.

metrics/events.go (1)

403-422: LGTM!

The new type LongMethodEvent and its associated methods GetBackend and MarshalFastJson are correctly implemented, following the same pattern as other event types in the file.

Comment on lines +74 to 75
_, _ = gz.Write(s)
_ = gz.Close()
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check the error return value of gz.Write.

Ignoring the error return value of gz.Write could lead to unnoticed errors during the compression process.

-  _, _ = gz.Write(s)
+  if _, err := gz.Write(s); err != nil {
+    return ""
+  }

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Tools
GitHub Check: lint

[failure] 74-74:
Error return value of gz.Write is not checked (errcheck)

lineCount = 0
} else {
if lineCount < 3 {
sb.WriteString(strings.Replace(addressPattern.ReplaceAllString(line, ""), "\t", "", -1))
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use strings.ReplaceAll for better readability and performance.

The strings.ReplaceAll method is more concise and avoids the need for specifying the -1 parameter.

-  sb.WriteString(strings.Replace(addressPattern.ReplaceAllString(line, ""), "\t", "", -1))
+  sb.WriteString(strings.ReplaceAll(addressPattern.ReplaceAllString(line, ""), "\t", ""))
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
sb.WriteString(strings.Replace(addressPattern.ReplaceAllString(line, ""), "\t", "", -1))
sb.WriteString(strings.ReplaceAll(addressPattern.ReplaceAllString(line, ""), "\t", ""))
Tools
golangci-lint

[error] 43-43: wrapperFunc: use strings.ReplaceAll method in strings.Replace(addressPattern.ReplaceAllString(line, ""), "\t", "", -1)

(gocritic)

GitHub Check: lint

[failure] 43-43:
wrapperFunc: use strings.ReplaceAll method in strings.Replace(addressPattern.ReplaceAllString(line, ""), "\t", "", -1) (gocritic)

@fat-fellow fat-fellow merged commit 1f12679 into main Jul 15, 2024
@fat-fellow fat-fellow deleted the go-3747-improve-stacktrace-debug branch July 15, 2024 12:26
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 15, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants